Quantum Si Company Insiders
QSIAW Stock | USD 0.48 0.05 11.63% |
Quantum Si employs about 149 people. The company is managed by 20 executives with a total tenure of roughly 348 years, averaging almost 17.0 years of service per executive, having 7.45 employees per reported executive. Recap of Quantum Si's management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
Quantum |
Quantum Si Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.2485) % which means that it has lost $0.2485 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.4148) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Quantum Si's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Quantum Si manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.43 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.5 in 2025. At this time, Quantum Si's Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to climb to about 848.4 K in 2025, whereas Other Assets are likely to drop 0.86 in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 118.3 M in 2025. Net Loss is likely to drop to about (125.2 M) in 2025
Quantum Si Workforce Comparison
Quantum Si incorporated is rated second in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Health Care industry is at this time estimated at about 936. Quantum Si retains roughly 149 in number of employees claiming about 16% of equities under Health Care industry.
Quantum Si Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Quantum Si insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Quantum Si's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Quantum Si insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Dekkers Marijn E few days ago Acquisition by Dekkers Marijn E of 150000 shares of Quantum Si subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
John Stark over a week ago Insider Trading | ||
Fattori Ruth A over two weeks ago Acquisition by Fattori Ruth A of 120481 shares of Quantum Si at 1.41 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Matthew Dyer over two weeks ago Acquisition by Matthew Dyer of 79750 shares of Quantum Si subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Michael McKenna over three months ago Acquisition by Michael McKenna of 100000 shares of Quantum Si at 9.72 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Jeffrey Hawkins over three months ago Insider Trading | ||
Mendel Scott over three months ago Acquisition by Mendel Scott of 141843 shares of Quantum Si subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Jonathan Rothberg over six months ago Insider Trading |
Quantum Si Notable Stakeholders
A Quantum Si stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Quantum Si often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Quantum Si's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Quantum Si's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Jeffrey Hawkins | CEO President | Profile | |
Jonathan Rothberg | Founder Chairman | Profile | |
Jeffry CPA | CFO Treasurer | Profile | |
Todd Rearick | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Katherine Atkinson | Senior Brand | Profile | |
Todd Bennett | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Michael McKenna | Pres COO | Profile | |
Claudia Drayton | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Jeffry Keyes | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Juan Avendano | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Alex Hutcheson | Senior Service | Profile | |
John Stark | CEO Director | Profile | |
John Vieceli | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Christian Lapointe | G Counsel | Profile | |
Lindsay Thompson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Matthew Dyer | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Grace Johnston | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Johan Denecke | Senior Operations | Profile | |
Michael MD | Chief Director | Profile | |
Christian JD | General Secretary | Profile |
About Quantum Si Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Quantum Si incorporated often depends on how effective the management is. Quantum Si management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Quantum management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Quantum management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (0.41) | (0.43) | |
Return On Capital Employed | (0.47) | (0.50) | |
Return On Assets | (0.41) | (0.43) | |
Return On Equity | (0.47) | (0.49) |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Quantum Si's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Quantum Si incorporated. Check Quantum Si's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Quantum Si's management manipulating its earnings.
Quantum Si Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Quantum Si use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Quantum Si within its industry.Quantum Si Manpower Efficiency
Return on Quantum Si Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 20.5K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 152.9K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 677.9K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 5.1M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 1.3M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 10M |
Additional Tools for Quantum Stock Analysis
When running Quantum Si's price analysis, check to measure Quantum Si's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Quantum Si is operating at the current time. Most of Quantum Si's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Quantum Si's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Quantum Si's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Quantum Si to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.