Oil States Company Insiders
| OIS Stock | USD 5.40 0.11 2.08% |
Oil States employs about 2.4 K people. The company is managed by 22 executives with a total tenure of roughly 157 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 110.86 employees per reported executive. Breaking down Oil States' management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Cynthia Taylor CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| Robert Potter Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Oil |
Oil States' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Oil States' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Oil will maintain a workforce of slightly above 2810 employees by April 2025.Oil States Management Team Effectiveness
Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to -0.01 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to -0.02 in 2025. At this time, Oil States' Asset Turnover is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Oil States' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Oil States manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 55.7 M in 2025. Net Loss is likely to gain to about (8.2 M) in 2025
Oil States Workforce Comparison
Oil States International is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is now estimated at about 60,789. Oil States holds roughly 2,439 in number of employees claiming about 4% of equities under Energy industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.02) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of (0.05) %, which entails that for every $100 of revenue, it lost $0.05. Oil States Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Oil States insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Oil States' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Oil States insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-01 | 0.4667 | 7 | 15 | 1,067,632 | 399,807 |
| 2024-06-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 202,369 | 1,876 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.5714 | 8 | 14 | 995,169 | 372,720 |
| 2023-06-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 131,921 | 1,654 |
| 2023-03-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 369,229 | 175,414 |
| 2022-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 138,596 | 1,433 |
| 2022-03-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 514,816 | 140,075 |
| 2021-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,956 | 12,870 |
| 2021-06-01 | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 131,706 | 0.00 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.32 | 8 | 25 | 515,599 | 235,907 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.5556 | 15 | 27 | 564,120 | 177,631 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 766.00 | 22,383 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 940.00 | 4,519 |
| 2019-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 47,653 | 3,000 |
| 2019-03-01 | 0.3871 | 12 | 31 | 519,028 | 136,306 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 378.00 | 6,899 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2.0 | 8 | 4 | 24,364 | 0.00 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.3077 | 8 | 26 | 248,308 | 5,982,693 |
| 2017-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 442.00 | 7,588 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 493.00 | 4,708 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.3333 | 7 | 21 | 140,522 | 47,697 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 321.00 | 31,286 |
| 2016-09-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 31,062 | 0.00 |
| 2016-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 21,184 | 716.00 |
| 2016-03-01 | 0.2759 | 8 | 29 | 161,963 | 87,223 |
| 2015-12-01 | 0.5833 | 7 | 12 | 108,983 | 215,543 |
| 2015-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 478.00 | 0.00 |
| 2015-06-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 84,740 | 96,580 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.4545 | 15 | 33 | 321,096 | 187,741 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 136,630 | 162,811 |
| 2014-06-01 | 4.5714 | 64 | 14 | 990,747 | 1,142,513 |
| 2014-03-01 | 0.4848 | 16 | 33 | 85,127 | 63,408 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.2143 | 3 | 14 | 1,030,123 | 400,378 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.4 | 8 | 20 | 107,621 | 1,230,500 |
| 2013-06-01 | 4.0 | 12 | 3 | 30,465 | 20,149 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.475 | 19 | 40 | 126,812 | 127,523 |
| 2012-12-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 23,146 | 32,971 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.5385 | 7 | 13 | 82,826 | 171,695 |
| 2012-06-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 17,615 | 14,524 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.5455 | 24 | 44 | 155,503 | 123,053 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.5263 | 10 | 19 | 39,506 | 76,125 |
| 2011-09-01 | 1.5714 | 11 | 7 | 71,767 | 76,142 |
| 2011-06-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 12,453 | 231.00 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.7931 | 23 | 29 | 137,298 | 63,718 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.5 | 12 | 24 | 95,735 | 191,183 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.55 | 11 | 20 | 100,525 | 200,808 |
| 2010-06-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 18,901 | 4,230 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.7826 | 18 | 23 | 194,346 | 55,738 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.5556 | 5 | 9 | 32,755 | 71,500 |
| 2009-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 37,785 | 75,000 |
| 2009-06-01 | 1.4545 | 16 | 11 | 154,691 | 92,730 |
| 2009-03-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 210,746 | 3,657 |
| 2008-12-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 20,536 | 20,000 |
| 2008-06-01 | 0.5238 | 11 | 21 | 25,752 | 35,000 |
| 2008-03-01 | 1.5714 | 11 | 7 | 168,000 | 1,227 |
| 2007-09-01 | 0.0952 | 14 | 147 | 294,613 | 585,986 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.2889 | 13 | 45 | 118,738 | 231,500 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.5217 | 12 | 23 | 203,750 | 215,146 |
| 2006-12-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 219,518 | 1,617,506 |
| 2006-09-01 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 38,000 | 31,607 |
| 2006-06-01 | 0.88 | 22 | 25 | 300,887 | 462,802 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.4706 | 16 | 34 | 284,063 | 2,130,342 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.1304 | 3 | 23 | 61,250 | 1,105,638 |
| 2005-09-01 | 1.1111 | 10 | 9 | 249,689 | 2,333,721 |
| 2005-06-01 | 2.5 | 15 | 6 | 262,120 | 1,952,948 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.9375 | 15 | 16 | 417,350 | 2,215,500 |
| 2004-12-01 | 4.0 | 20 | 5 | 65,556 | 2,650,299 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.0588 | 36 | 34 | 113,641 | 13,295,000 |
| 2004-06-01 | 1.1786 | 33 | 28 | 128,250 | 13,400,000 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.9565 | 22 | 23 | 435,369 | 9,468,334 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.4706 | 8 | 17 | 329,559 | 741,027 |
| 2003-09-01 | 0.25 | 4 | 16 | 4,257 | 2,000,000 |
| 2003-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 30,068 | 33.00 |
Oil States Notable Stakeholders
An Oil States stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Oil States often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Oil States' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Oil States' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Cynthia CPA | CEO President | Profile | |
| Cynthia Taylor | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Robert Potter | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Philip Moses | Executive Vice President, Offshore, Manufactured Products and Downhole Technologies | Profile | |
| Lloyd Hajdik | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer | Profile | |
| Lias Steen | Executive Vice President - Human Resources and Legal | Profile | |
| Brian Taylor | Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | Profile | |
| Christopher Cragg | Executive Vice President - Operations | Profile | |
| Lloyd CPA | CFO VP | Profile | |
| Christopher Seaver | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Darrell Hollek | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lawrence Dickerson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| William Kleef | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Hallie Vanderhider | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Brian CPA | Controller VP | Profile | |
| E Wright | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ellen Pennington | Counsel Secretary | Profile | |
| Patricia Gil | Director Relations | Profile | |
| Denise CastilloRhodes | Independent Director | Profile | |
| S Nelson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Denise Rhodes | Independent Director | Profile | |
| William Maxwell | Corporate Secretary | Profile |
About Oil States Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Oil States International often depends on how effective the management is. Oil States management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Oil management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Oil management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.02) | (0.02) |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Oil States' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Oil States International. Check Oil States' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Oil States' management manipulating its earnings.
Oil States Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Oil States use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Oil States within its industry.Oil States Manpower Efficiency
Return on Oil States Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 284K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 31.5M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 4.6K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 511.7K | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 139.6K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 15.5M |
Additional Tools for Oil Stock Analysis
When running Oil States' price analysis, check to measure Oil States' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Oil States is operating at the current time. Most of Oil States' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Oil States' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Oil States' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Oil States to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.