Microsoft (Mexico) Insiders
MSFT Stock | MXN 8,600 230.00 2.60% |
Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 27 executives with a total tenure of roughly 188 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 8185.19 employees per reported executive. Break down of Microsoft's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Satya Nadella CEO Chief Executive Officer, Director |
John Thompson Chairman Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board |
Microsoft |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Software—Infrastructure industry is now estimated at about 460,394. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 48% of equities listed under Software—Infrastructure industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.33 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.41 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.41. Microsoft Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Microsoft Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Microsoft price series and its benchmark/peer.
Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Satya Nadella | Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
John Thompson | Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
JeanPhilippe Courtois | Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | Profile | |
Christopher Capossela | Executive Vice President, Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Margaret Johnson | Executive Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
Amy Hood | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Bradford Smith | Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Kevin Scott | Chief Technology Officer, Executive Vice President - Technology & Research | Profile | |
Kathleen Hogan | Executive Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
Charles Scharf | Independent Director | Profile | |
Penny Pritzker | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sandra Peterson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Teri ListStoll | Independent Director | Profile | |
Padmasree Warrior | Independent Director | Profile | |
Hugh Johnston | Independent Director | Profile | |
Arne Sorenson | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Stanton | Independent Director | Profile | |
Reid Hoffman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Bradford LCA | Pres Chairman | Profile | |
Emma Walmsley | Independent Director | Profile | |
Christopher Young | Executive Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
Judson Althoff | Ex Officer | Profile | |
Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
Brett Iversen | Gen Relations | Profile | |
Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile | |
Frank Brod | Corporate Vice President - Finance & Administration, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Alice Jolla | Corporate Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. Microsoft Corporation was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. MICROSOFT CORP operates under SoftwareInfrastructure classification in Mexico and is traded on Mexico Stock Exchange. It employs 221000 people.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Check Microsoft's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 897.1K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 7.3B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 329.1K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 2.7B |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.