Iron Mountain Company Leadership
| IRM Stock | USD 92.40 0.94 1.03% |
Iron Mountain employs about 28.9 K people. The company is managed by 34 executives with a total tenure of roughly 211 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 848.53 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Iron Mountain's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| William Meaney CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| Alfred Verrecchia Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Iron |
Iron Mountain's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Iron Mountain, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Iron Mountain by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2025-01-31 | Senator Markwayne Mullin | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2025-01-30 | Senator Markwayne Mullin | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2024-01-03 | Senator Thomas R Carper | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-01-02 | Senator Thomas R Carper | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Iron Mountain Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0419 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0419 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 2.2506 %, implying that it generated $2.2506 on every 100 dollars invested. Iron Mountain's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Iron Mountain manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Iron Mountain Workforce Comparison
Iron Mountain Incorporated is currently regarded as number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Real Estate industry is currently estimated at about 54,772. Iron Mountain totals roughly 28,850 in number of employees claiming about 53% of equities listed under Real Estate industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.03 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.21 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.21 of operating income. Iron Mountain Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Iron Mountain insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Iron Mountain's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Iron Mountain insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
William Meaney over six months ago Disposition of 15875 shares by William Meaney of Iron Mountain at 48.538 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Kent Dauten over six months ago Disposition of 100000 shares by Kent Dauten of Iron Mountain subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
John Tomovcsik over six months ago Disposition of 2500 shares by John Tomovcsik of Iron Mountain at 100.0 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Jennifer Allerton over six months ago Disposition of 287 shares by Jennifer Allerton of Iron Mountain at 79.64 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
William Meaney over six months ago Disposition of 15875 shares by William Meaney of Iron Mountain at 48.538 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Doyle Simons over six months ago Acquisition by Doyle Simons of 273 shares of Iron Mountain subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Greg McIntosh over six months ago Disposition of 23 shares by Greg McIntosh of Iron Mountain at 38.83 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Walter Rakowich over six months ago Disposition of 954 shares by Walter Rakowich of Iron Mountain at 81.33 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Iron Mountain Notable Stakeholders
An Iron Mountain stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Iron Mountain often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Iron Mountain's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Iron Mountain's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| William Meaney | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Alfred Verrecchia | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| John Tomovcsik | Executive Vice President General Manager - Records and Information Management | Profile | |
| Ernest Cloutier | Executive Vice President, General Manager - Global Records and Information Management | Profile | |
| Theodore Maclean | Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Garry Watzke | Senior President | Profile | |
| Daniel Borges | Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
| Deborah Marson | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Barry Hytinen | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Deirdre Evens | Executive Vice President, General Manager - Records and Information Management, North America | Profile | |
| Greg McIntosh | Executive Vice President, General Manager, Global Records and Information Management. | Profile | |
| Robin Matlock | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Kent Dauten | Lead Director, Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jennifer Allerton | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Paul Deninger | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Doyle Simons | Independent Director | Profile | |
| PerKristian Halvorsen | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Monte Ford | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Pamela Arway | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Walter Rakowich | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Clarke Bailey | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Wendy Murdock | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Michelle Altamura | General VP | Profile | |
| Greg CA | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Carole Meixsell | Senior Support | Profile | |
| Mark Rupe | Senior Relations | Profile | |
| Gillian Tiltman | Senior Relations | Profile | |
| Edward Greene | Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Ellen Hall | Global Development | Profile | |
| Hitesh Gupta | Managing India | Profile | |
| BSc MEng | CEO Pres | Profile | |
| Jemma Johns | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Mark Kidd | Executive Vice President General Manager, data centers | Profile | |
| Greg Lever | Managing Australia | Profile |
About Iron Mountain Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Iron Mountain often depends on how effective the management is. Iron Mountain management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Iron management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Iron management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Iron Mountain Incorporated , founded in 1951, is the global leader for storage and information management services. Providing solutions that include secure records storage, information management, digital transformation, secure destruction, as well as data centers, cloud services and art storage and logistics, Iron Mountain helps customers lower cost and risk, comply with regulations, recover from disaster, and enable a more digital way of working. Iron Mountain operates under REITSpecialty classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 25000 people.
Iron Mountain Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Iron Mountain use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Iron Mountain within its industry.Iron Mountain Manpower Efficiency
Return on Iron Mountain Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 213.2K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 180.9M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 6.4K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 5.4M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Iron Mountain Incorporated. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.
Is Other Specialized REITs space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Iron Mountain. If investors know Iron will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Iron Mountain listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Iron Mountain is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Iron that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Iron Mountain's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Iron Mountain's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Iron Mountain's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Iron Mountain's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Iron Mountain's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Iron Mountain is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Iron Mountain's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.