John Hancock ETF Insiders
| HPS Etf | USD 15.14 0.03 0.20% |
John Hancock employs about 16 people. The company is managed by 18 executives with a total tenure of roughly 217 years, averaging almost 12.0 years of service per executive, having 0.89 employees per reported executive. Breaking down John Hancock's management performance can provide insight into the exchange-traded fund performance.
| Gregory Russo Executive Independent Trustee |
| Frances Rathke Insider Independent Director |
John |
John Hancock Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 3.17 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $3.17 of profit. This is considered to be average in the sector. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (6.24) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. John Hancock's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well John Hancock manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.John Hancock Workforce Comparison
John Hancock Preferred is rated below average in number of employees as compared to similar ETFs. The total workforce of Asset Management category is currently estimated at about 144. John Hancock retains roughly 16.0 in number of employees claiming about 11% of ETFs in Asset Management category.
The company has Net Profit Margin of (70.54) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 86.57 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $86.57 of operating income. John Hancock Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific John Hancock insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on John Hancock's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, John Hancock insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Bacic William K over two months ago Acquisition by Bacic William K of 706 shares of John Hancock at 14.25 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Von Dem Hagen Halina over two months ago Insider Trading | ||
Ellison Noni L over two months ago Acquisition by Ellison Noni L of 740 shares of John Hancock at 15.26 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Ellison Noni L over two months ago Acquisition by Ellison Noni L of 740 shares of John Hancock at 15.26 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
James Boyle over three months ago Acquisition by James Boyle of 848 shares of John Hancock at 17.7095 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Charles Bardelis over three months ago Acquisition by Charles Bardelis of 300 shares of John Hancock at 17.8 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Nataupsky Jeff over three months ago Insider Trading | ||
Lo York over three months ago Insider Trading |
John Hancock Notable Stakeholders
A John Hancock stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as John Hancock often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. John Hancock's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting John Hancock's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| James Oates | Independent Chairman of the Board of Trustees | Profile | |
| Steven Pruchansky | Independent Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees | Profile | |
| Hassell McClellan | Independent Chairman of the Board of Trustees | Profile | |
| Andrew Arnott | President, Trustee | Profile | |
| Charles Rizzo | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
| Gregory Russo | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Frances Rathke | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Christopher Sechler | Secretary, Chief Legal Officer | Profile | |
| William Cunningham | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| James Boyle | Non-Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Deborah Jackson | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Marianne Harrison | Trustee | Profile | |
| Peter Burgess | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Charles Bardelis | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Francis Knox | Chief Compliance Officer | Profile | |
| Grace Fey | Independent Trustee | Profile | |
| Trevor Swanberg | Chief Compliance Officer | Profile | |
| Salvatore Schiavone | Treasurer | Profile |
About John Hancock Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as John Hancock Preferred often depends on how effective the management is. John Hancock management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of John management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the John management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by John Hancock Investment Management LLC. John Hancock is listed under Asset Management in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange exchange.
The data published in John Hancock's official financial statements typically reflect John Hancock's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. However, there are additional fundamental indicators that are easier to understand and visualize along the underlying realities that are driving John Hancock's quantitative information. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by John accountants, it's essential to understand John Hancock's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality within the context of the Financial Services space in which it operates.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in John Hancock's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of John Hancock Preferred. Check John Hancock's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of John Hancock's management manipulating its earnings.
John Hancock Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as John Hancock use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare John Hancock within its industry.John Hancock Manpower Efficiency
Return on John Hancock Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 3M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 2.7M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 2.1M | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 1.9M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in John Hancock Preferred. Also, note that the market value of any etf could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
The market value of John Hancock Preferred is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of John that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of John Hancock's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is John Hancock's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because John Hancock's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect John Hancock's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between John Hancock's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if John Hancock is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, John Hancock's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.