FAR Company Top Insiders
| FARYF Stock | USD 0.29 0.02 6.45% |
FAR employs about 15 people. The company is managed by 5 executives with a total tenure of roughly 35 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 3.0 employees per reported executive. Examination of FAR's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| BCom BComm Insider Chief Officer |
| Claire NewsteadSinclair Insider Company Sec |
FAR |
FAR Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.1696) % which means that it has lost $0.1696 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.4669) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. FAR's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well FAR manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.FAR Workforce Comparison
FAR Limited is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Oil & Gas E&P industry is currently estimated at about 1,559. FAR maintains roughly 15.0 in number of employees contributing less than 1% to all equities under Oil & Gas E&P industry.
FAR Limited Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. FAR Limited Price Series Summation is a cross summation of FAR price series and its benchmark/peer.
FAR Notable Stakeholders
A FAR stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as FAR often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. FAR's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting FAR's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| BCom BComm | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Claire NewsteadSinclair | Company Sec | Profile | |
| Jon Keall | Chief Geoscientist | Profile | |
| June Atling | Admin Australia | Profile | |
| Bruno Delanoue | Prsident Senegal | Profile |
About FAR Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as FAR Limited often depends on how effective the management is. FAR management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of FAR management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the FAR management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
FAR Limited operates as an oil and gas exploration and development company with primary assets in West Africa and Australia. FAR Limited was incorporated in 1984 and is based in Melbourne, Australia. Far operates under Oil Gas EP classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange.
FAR Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as FAR use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare FAR within its industry.FAR Manpower Efficiency
Return on FAR Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | -11.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | -34.9K | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 3M | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 9M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 3.6M | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 10.8M |
Complementary Tools for FAR Pink Sheet analysis
When running FAR's price analysis, check to measure FAR's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FAR is operating at the current time. Most of FAR's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FAR's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FAR's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FAR to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm |