ERecord Management Company Top Insiders
ERMG Stock | USD 0.0002 0.00 0.00% |
ERecord Management employs about 7 people. The company is managed by 7 executives with a total tenure of roughly 0 years, averaging almost 0.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Examination of ERecord Management's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
ERecord |
ERecord Management Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.505) % which means that it has lost $0.505 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (1.1502) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. ERecord Management's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well ERecord Management manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to -1.31. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to -1.31. The ERecord Management's current Total Assets is estimated to increase to about 914.8 K, while Net Tangible Assets are projected to decrease to (112.7 K).The current Net Loss is estimated to decrease to about (866 K)
ERecord Management Workforce Comparison
ERecord Management is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 142,080. ERecord Management adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Information Technology industry.
ERecord Management Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. ERecord Management Price Series Summation is a cross summation of ERecord Management price series and its benchmark/peer.
ERecord Management Notable Stakeholders
An ERecord Management stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as ERecord Management often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. ERecord Management's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting ERecord Management's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Nancy Vitolo | Secretary President | Profile | |
Philip Lacqua | Treasurer President | Profile | |
Robert Verdicchio | Scientific Consultant | Profile | |
General Ward | Consultant Board | Profile | |
Daniel Stack | Consultant Board | Profile | |
Louis Levine | Consultant Board | Profile | |
Shawn Walsh | Director consultant | Profile |
About ERecord Management Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as ERecord Management often depends on how effective the management is. ERecord Management management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of ERecord management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the ERecord management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (1.25) | (1.31) | |
Return On Capital Employed | (1.25) | (1.31) | |
Return On Assets | (1.25) | (1.31) | |
Return On Equity | 1.04 | 0.93 |
ERecord Management Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as ERecord Management use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare ERecord Management within its industry.ERecord Management Manpower Efficiency
Return on ERecord Management Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 10.8K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 10.8K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 102.4K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 102.4K |
Complementary Tools for ERecord Stock analysis
When running ERecord Management's price analysis, check to measure ERecord Management's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy ERecord Management is operating at the current time. Most of ERecord Management's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of ERecord Management's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move ERecord Management's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of ERecord Management to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. |