EROAD (Australia) Insiders
| ERD Stock | 0.87 0.01 1.16% |
EROAD employs about 21 people. The company is managed by 21 executives with a total tenure of roughly 49 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Breaking down EROAD's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Mark Heine CEO Executive CoCEO |
| Akinyemi Koyi President President Strategy |
EROAD |
EROAD Management Team Effectiveness
EROAD's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well EROAD manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.EROAD Workforce Comparison
EROAD is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 13,476. EROAD adds roughly 21.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Information Technology industry.
EROAD Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. EROAD Price Series Summation is a cross summation of EROAD price series and its benchmark/peer.
EROAD Notable Stakeholders
An EROAD stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as EROAD often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. EROAD's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting EROAD's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Mark Heine | Executive CoCEO | Profile | |
| Akinyemi Koyi | President Strategy | Profile | |
| Selwyn Pellett | Ex Director | Profile | |
| Tim Mole | Director Technology | Profile | |
| Nina Elter | VP Devel | Profile | |
| Craig Marris | Chief Fleets | Profile | |
| Aaron Latimer | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Matthew Dalton | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| David Kenneson | CoChief Officer | Profile | |
| Dean Marris | Chief Construction | Profile | |
| Margaret Warrington | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Shelley Prentice | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Sarah Thompson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Casey Ellis | Pres America | Profile | |
| Tim Hogan | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Ksenija Chobanovich | General Secretary | Profile | |
| Bridget Oshannessey | Acting Officer | Profile | |
| Steen Andersen | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Rebecca Lineham | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| Duanne OBrien | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Mark Davidson | Executive Marketing | Profile |
About EROAD Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as EROAD often depends on how effective the management is. EROAD management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of EROAD management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the EROAD management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in EROAD's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of EROAD. Check EROAD's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of EROAD's management manipulating its earnings.
EROAD Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as EROAD use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare EROAD within its industry.EROAD Manpower Efficiency
Return on EROAD Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 8.3M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 8.3M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 14.3K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 14.3K | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 314.3K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 314.3K |
Additional Tools for EROAD Stock Analysis
When running EROAD's price analysis, check to measure EROAD's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy EROAD is operating at the current time. Most of EROAD's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of EROAD's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move EROAD's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of EROAD to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.