CMS Energy Company Insiders
CMS Stock | USD 73.50 0.24 0.33% |
CMS Energy's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading CMS Energy stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. CMS Energy employs about 8.3 K people. The company is managed by 34 executives with a total tenure of roughly 211 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 244.82 employees per reported executive.
John Russell CEO CEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. Committee |
Garrick Rochow CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2025-03-03 | Brandon J Hofmeister | Disposed 2000 @ 73.77 | View | ||
2025-02-19 | Laura Wright | Disposed 2500 @ 69.84 | View | ||
2025-02-13 | Scott B Mcintosh | Disposed 6700 @ 69.76 | View | ||
2024-12-19 | John G Russell | Disposed 28750 @ 65.85 | View | ||
2024-12-13 | Brandon J Hofmeister | Disposed 2000 @ 67.22 | View | ||
2024-11-21 | Scott B Mcintosh | Disposed 936 @ 68.5 | View | ||
2024-11-18 | Brandon J Hofmeister | Disposed 2000 @ 68.17 | View | ||
2024-06-13 | Brandon J Hofmeister | Disposed 1667 @ 59.98 | View | ||
2024-06-07 | Jon E Barfield | Disposed 2360 @ 60.79 | View | ||
2024-05-02 | Brian F Rich | Disposed 2000 @ 61.1 | View |
Monitoring CMS Energy's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
CMS |
CMS Energy's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with CMS Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that CMS will maintain a workforce of slightly above 9870 employees by April 2025.CMS Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0298 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0298 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1123 %, implying that it generated $0.1123 on every 100 dollars invested. CMS Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CMS Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, CMS Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.05 in 2025, whereas Return On Equity is likely to drop 0.05 in 2025. At this time, CMS Energy's Other Current Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to 0.03 in 2025, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 17.7 B in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 202.4 M in 2025. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to drop to about 550.6 M in 2025
CMS Energy Workforce Comparison
CMS Energy is rated fifth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Utilities industry is currently estimated at about 64,428. CMS Energy retains roughly 8,324 in number of employees claiming about 13% of Utilities industry.
CMS Energy Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.13 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.23 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.23 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.47 | 0.44 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.21 | 0.1979 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.16 | 0.1494 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0293 | 0.0279 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.0493 | 0.088 |
|
|
CMS Energy Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific CMS Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on CMS Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, CMS Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-03-01 | 1.1538 | 15 | 13 | 204,113 | 61,305 |
2024-09-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 6,001 |
2024-06-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 28,430 | 6,027 |
2024-03-01 | 0.6452 | 20 | 31 | 315,893 | 129,473 |
2023-06-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 28,455 | 7,500 |
2023-03-01 | 0.5882 | 20 | 34 | 235,852 | 61,280 |
2022-06-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 23,620 | 4,409 |
2022-03-01 | 1.25 | 30 | 24 | 233,061 | 72,915 |
2021-03-01 | 1.4286 | 30 | 21 | 250,595 | 75,180 |
2020-06-01 | 0.6667 | 10 | 15 | 26,810 | 36,122 |
2020-03-01 | 1.12 | 28 | 25 | 253,924 | 145,535 |
2019-12-01 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 1,259 | 45,070 |
2019-06-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 27,150 | 33,256 |
2019-03-01 | 1.3182 | 29 | 22 | 246,991 | 78,868 |
2018-06-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 25,191 | 17,611 |
2018-03-01 | 1.4737 | 28 | 19 | 318,228 | 105,560 |
2017-09-01 | 0.1111 | 1 | 9 | 1,000.00 | 90,675 |
2017-06-01 | 0.9167 | 11 | 12 | 56,295 | 88,246 |
2017-03-01 | 1.25 | 30 | 24 | 391,136 | 247,402 |
2016-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 3,000 | 101,800 |
2016-09-01 | 0.1818 | 2 | 11 | 9,692 | 285,473 |
2016-06-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 29,190 | 313,059 |
2016-03-01 | 1.3571 | 19 | 14 | 468,469 | 209,581 |
2015-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 3,000 | 12,908 |
2015-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2,709 | 0.00 |
2015-06-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 32,120 | 18,986 |
2015-03-01 | 0.8889 | 16 | 18 | 390,532 | 220,394 |
2014-06-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 34,170 | 4,820 |
2014-03-01 | 1.3636 | 15 | 11 | 378,839 | 201,682 |
2013-12-01 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 1,796 | 3,849 |
2013-09-01 | 0.8125 | 13 | 16 | 180,496 | 226,670 |
2013-06-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 26,289 | 342,225 |
2013-03-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 229,465 | 57,435 |
2012-12-01 | 0.1429 | 1 | 7 | 20,000 | 360,630 |
2012-09-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 302,531 | 367,841 |
2012-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 29,984 | 3,000 |
2012-03-01 | 1.2 | 6 | 5 | 239,086 | 31,300 |
2011-09-01 | 0.5385 | 7 | 13 | 176,440 | 277,771 |
2011-06-01 | 1.8 | 9 | 5 | 78,600 | 165,000 |
2011-03-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 244,800 | 200,000 |
2010-09-01 | 0.35 | 7 | 20 | 278,616 | 300,356 |
2010-06-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 138,061 | 65,911 |
2009-09-01 | 0.4211 | 8 | 19 | 453,107 | 220,874 |
2008-09-01 | 0.5625 | 9 | 16 | 471,100 | 316,933 |
2008-06-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 59,550 | 61,565 |
2007-09-01 | 0.6818 | 15 | 22 | 495,200 | 371,425 |
2007-06-01 | 3.6667 | 11 | 3 | 29,020 | 10,000 |
2007-03-01 | 0.3684 | 7 | 19 | 385,000 | 784,000 |
2006-09-01 | 0.4 | 8 | 20 | 332,000 | 51,114 |
2006-06-01 | 3.6667 | 11 | 3 | 35,267 | 24,147 |
2006-03-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 307.00 | 22,852 |
2005-12-01 | 0.3478 | 8 | 23 | 70,982 | 181,683 |
2005-09-01 | 0.4545 | 10 | 22 | 330,418 | 82,438 |
2005-06-01 | 1.1667 | 14 | 12 | 130,390 | 233,161 |
2005-03-01 | 0.1176 | 2 | 17 | 1,950 | 515,052 |
2004-12-01 | 0.6 | 6 | 10 | 76,100 | 227,922 |
2004-09-01 | 0.5 | 13 | 26 | 462,894 | 140,407 |
2004-06-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 31,329 | 4,404 |
2004-03-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 60,000 | 80,000 |
2003-09-01 | 1.8 | 18 | 10 | 1,048,000 | 173,732 |
CMS Energy Notable Stakeholders
A CMS Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as CMS Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. CMS Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting CMS Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
John Russell | CEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. Committee | Profile | |
Garrick Rochow | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Patricia Poppe | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Melissa Gleespen | Vice President Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Catherine Hendrian | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Glenn Barba | Vice President Controller, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Shaun Johnson | Senior Vice President General Counsel | Profile | |
Scott McIntosh | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President - Tax, Controller | Profile | |
Brian Rich | Senior Vice President - Customer Experience and Technology, Chief Customer Officer | Profile | |
Jean Brossoit | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Rejji Hayes | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Venkat Rao | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Laura Wright | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Harvey | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
John Sznewajs | Independent Director | Profile | |
Myrna Soto | Independent Director | Profile | |
Deborah Butler | Independent Director | Profile | |
Suzanne Shank | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kurt Darrow | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jon Barfield | Independent Director | Profile | |
Aaron Rajda | VP Officer | Profile | |
Jim Beechey | VP Officer | Profile | |
Angela Thompkins | Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer | Profile | |
Norm Kapala | Vice President | Profile | |
Tamara Faber | VP Officer | Profile | |
LeeRoy Wells | Senior Vice President - Operations | Profile | |
Jason Shore | Treasurer Relations | Profile | |
Ronald Tanski | Independent Director | Profile | |
Srikanth Maddipati | VP Treasurer | Profile | |
Shaun JD | General Optimization | Profile | |
Christine Wisniewski | Vice President - Operations Performance | Profile | |
Brandon Hofmeister | Sustainability Strategy | Profile | |
Tonya Berry | Senior Vice President - Transformation and Engineering | Profile | |
Amanda Wagenschutz | Vice President - People and Culture Operations | Profile |
About CMS Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as CMS Energy often depends on how effective the management is. CMS Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of CMS management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the CMS management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
Return On Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Equity | 0.09 | 0.05 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in CMS Energy's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of CMS Energy. Check CMS Energy's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of CMS Energy's management manipulating its earnings.
CMS Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as CMS Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare CMS Energy within its industry.CMS Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on CMS Energy Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 902.8K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 221M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 113.8K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 27.9M |
Additional Tools for CMS Stock Analysis
When running CMS Energy's price analysis, check to measure CMS Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CMS Energy is operating at the current time. Most of CMS Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CMS Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CMS Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CMS Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.