CMS Energy Company Insiders

CMS Stock  USD 73.50  0.24  0.33%   
CMS Energy's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading CMS Energy stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. CMS Energy employs about 8.3 K people. The company is managed by 34 executives with a total tenure of roughly 211 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 244.82 employees per reported executive.
John Russell  CEO
CEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. Committee
Garrick Rochow  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director

Insider Sentiment 0

 Mostly Selling

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2025-03-03Brandon J HofmeisterDisposed 2000 @ 73.77View
2025-02-19Laura WrightDisposed 2500 @ 69.84View
2025-02-13Scott B McintoshDisposed 6700 @ 69.76View
2024-12-19John G RussellDisposed 28750 @ 65.85View
2024-12-13Brandon J HofmeisterDisposed 2000 @ 67.22View
2024-11-21Scott B McintoshDisposed 936 @ 68.5View
2024-11-18Brandon J HofmeisterDisposed 2000 @ 68.17View
2024-06-13Brandon J HofmeisterDisposed 1667 @ 59.98View
2024-06-07Jon E BarfieldDisposed 2360 @ 60.79View
2024-05-02Brian F RichDisposed 2000 @ 61.1View
Monitoring CMS Energy's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
  
Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in CMS Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population.
For more information on how to buy CMS Stock please use our How to Invest in CMS Energy guide.

CMS Energy's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with CMS Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that CMS will maintain a workforce of slightly above 9870 employees by April 2025.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

CMS Energy Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0298 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0298 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1123 %, implying that it generated $0.1123 on every 100 dollars invested. CMS Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CMS Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, CMS Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.05 in 2025, whereas Return On Equity is likely to drop 0.05 in 2025. At this time, CMS Energy's Other Current Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to 0.03 in 2025, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 17.7 B in 2025.
Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 202.4 M in 2025. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to drop to about 550.6 M in 2025

CMS Energy Workforce Comparison

CMS Energy is rated fifth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Utilities industry is currently estimated at about 64,428. CMS Energy retains roughly 8,324 in number of employees claiming about 13% of Utilities industry.

CMS Energy Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.13 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.23 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.23 of operating income.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.470.44
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.210.1979
Notably Up
Pretty Stable
Pretax Profit Margin0.160.1494
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
Return On Assets0.02930.0279
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.04930.088
Way Down
Slightly volatile

CMS Energy Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific CMS Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on CMS Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, CMS Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2025-03-01
1.1538
15
13
 204,113 
 61,305 
2024-09-01
0.3333
1
3
 1.00 
 6,001 
2024-06-01
3.3333
10
3
 28,430 
 6,027 
2024-03-01
0.6452
20
31
 315,893 
 129,473 
2023-06-01
2.75
11
4
 28,455 
 7,500 
2023-03-01
0.5882
20
34
 235,852 
 61,280 
2022-06-01
1.6667
10
6
 23,620 
 4,409 
2022-03-01
1.25
30
24
 233,061 
 72,915 
2021-03-01
1.4286
30
21
 250,595 
 75,180 
2020-06-01
0.6667
10
15
 26,810 
 36,122 
2020-03-01
1.12
28
25
 253,924 
 145,535 
2019-12-01
0.1
1
10
 1,259 
 45,070 
2019-06-01
1.6667
10
6
 27,150 
 33,256 
2019-03-01
1.3182
29
22
 246,991 
 78,868 
2018-06-01
2.25
9
4
 25,191 
 17,611 
2018-03-01
1.4737
28
19
 318,228 
 105,560 
2017-09-01
0.1111
1
9
 1,000.00 
 90,675 
2017-06-01
0.9167
11
12
 56,295 
 88,246 
2017-03-01
1.25
30
24
 391,136 
 247,402 
2016-12-01
0.3333
1
3
 3,000 
 101,800 
2016-09-01
0.1818
2
11
 9,692 
 285,473 
2016-06-01
2.5
10
4
 29,190 
 313,059 
2016-03-01
1.3571
19
14
 468,469 
 209,581 
2015-12-01
0.5
1
2
 3,000 
 12,908 
2015-09-01
0.5
1
2
 2,709 
 0.00 
2015-06-01
3.3333
10
3
 32,120 
 18,986 
2015-03-01
0.8889
16
18
 390,532 
 220,394 
2014-06-01
5.0
10
2
 34,170 
 4,820 
2014-03-01
1.3636
15
11
 378,839 
 201,682 
2013-12-01
0.1
1
10
 1,796 
 3,849 
2013-09-01
0.8125
13
16
 180,496 
 226,670 
2013-06-01
2.25
9
4
 26,289 
 342,225 
2013-03-01
1.4
7
5
 229,465 
 57,435 
2012-12-01
0.1429
1
7
 20,000 
 360,630 
2012-09-01
0.4444
8
18
 302,531 
 367,841 
2012-06-01
8.0
8
1
 29,984 
 3,000 
2012-03-01
1.2
6
5
 239,086 
 31,300 
2011-09-01
0.5385
7
13
 176,440 
 277,771 
2011-06-01
1.8
9
5
 78,600 
 165,000 
2011-03-01
6.0
6
1
 244,800 
 200,000 
2010-09-01
0.35
7
20
 278,616 
 300,356 
2010-06-01
1.5
9
6
 138,061 
 65,911 
2009-09-01
0.4211
8
19
 453,107 
 220,874 
2008-09-01
0.5625
9
16
 471,100 
 316,933 
2008-06-01
2.75
11
4
 59,550 
 61,565 
2007-09-01
0.6818
15
22
 495,200 
 371,425 
2007-06-01
3.6667
11
3
 29,020 
 10,000 
2007-03-01
0.3684
7
19
 385,000 
 784,000 
2006-09-01
0.4
8
20
 332,000 
 51,114 
2006-06-01
3.6667
11
3
 35,267 
 24,147 
2006-03-01
0.3333
1
3
 307.00 
 22,852 
2005-12-01
0.3478
8
23
 70,982 
 181,683 
2005-09-01
0.4545
10
22
 330,418 
 82,438 
2005-06-01
1.1667
14
12
 130,390 
 233,161 
2005-03-01
0.1176
2
17
 1,950 
 515,052 
2004-12-01
0.6
6
10
 76,100 
 227,922 
2004-09-01
0.5
13
26
 462,894 
 140,407 
2004-06-01
4.5
9
2
 31,329 
 4,404 
2004-03-01
1.3333
4
3
 60,000 
 80,000 
2003-09-01
1.8
18
10
 1,048,000 
 173,732 

CMS Energy Notable Stakeholders

A CMS Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as CMS Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. CMS Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting CMS Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
John RussellCEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. CommitteeProfile
Garrick RochowPresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Patricia PoppePresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Melissa GleespenVice President Corporate SecretaryProfile
Catherine HendrianSenior Vice PresidentProfile
Glenn BarbaVice President Controller, Chief Accounting OfficerProfile
Shaun JohnsonSenior Vice President General CounselProfile
Scott McIntoshChief Accounting Officer, Vice President - Tax, ControllerProfile
Brian RichSenior Vice President - Customer Experience and Technology, Chief Customer OfficerProfile
Jean BrossoitSenior Vice PresidentProfile
Rejji HayesChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice PresidentProfile
Venkat RaoSenior Vice PresidentProfile
Laura WrightIndependent DirectorProfile
William HarveyPresiding Independent DirectorProfile
John SznewajsIndependent DirectorProfile
Myrna SotoIndependent DirectorProfile
Deborah ButlerIndependent DirectorProfile
Suzanne ShankIndependent DirectorProfile
Kurt DarrowIndependent DirectorProfile
Jon BarfieldIndependent DirectorProfile
Aaron RajdaVP OfficerProfile
Jim BeecheyVP OfficerProfile
Angela ThompkinsVice President and Chief Diversity OfficerProfile
Norm KapalaVice PresidentProfile
Tamara FaberVP OfficerProfile
LeeRoy WellsSenior Vice President - OperationsProfile
Jason ShoreTreasurer RelationsProfile
Ronald TanskiIndependent DirectorProfile
Srikanth MaddipatiVP TreasurerProfile
Shaun JDGeneral OptimizationProfile
Christine WisniewskiVice President - Operations PerformanceProfile
Brandon HofmeisterSustainability StrategyProfile
Tonya BerrySenior Vice President - Transformation and EngineeringProfile
Amanda WagenschutzVice President - People and Culture OperationsProfile

About CMS Energy Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as CMS Energy often depends on how effective the management is. CMS Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of CMS management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the CMS management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.03  0.03 
Return On Capital Employed 0.04  0.05 
Return On Assets 0.03  0.03 
Return On Equity 0.09  0.05 
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in CMS Energy's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of CMS Energy. Check CMS Energy's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of CMS Energy's management manipulating its earnings.

CMS Energy Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as CMS Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare CMS Energy within its industry.

CMS Energy Manpower Efficiency

Return on CMS Energy Manpower

Revenue Per Employee902.8K
Revenue Per Executive221M
Net Income Per Employee113.8K
Net Income Per Executive27.9M

Additional Tools for CMS Stock Analysis

When running CMS Energy's price analysis, check to measure CMS Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CMS Energy is operating at the current time. Most of CMS Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CMS Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CMS Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CMS Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.