Agilent Technologies Company Insiders
| A Stock | USD 138.14 3.77 2.81% |
About 95 percent of Agilent Technologies' insiders are activelly selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Agilent Technologies stock suggests that a very large number of insiders are panicking at this time. Agilent Technologies employs about 17.4 K people. The company is managed by 35 executives with a total tenure of roughly 193 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 497.14 employees per reported executive.
| Michael McMullen CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
| Boon Koh Chairman Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board |
Agilent Technologies' Insider Buying Vs Selling
5
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-09-27 | Padraig Mcdonnell | Disposed 47 @ 150 | View | ||
| 2024-09-26 | Dominique Grau | Disposed 9990 @ 145 | View | ||
| 2024-08-22 | Padraig Mcdonnell | Disposed 1958 @ 145 | View | ||
| 2024-07-26 | Padraig Mcdonnell | Disposed 1958 @ 140 | View | ||
| 2024-06-10 | Dominique Grau | Disposed 15000 @ 133.28 | View | ||
| 2024-06-03 | Padraig Mcdonnell | Disposed 1958 @ 130 | View | ||
| 2024-05-03 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 139.47 | |||
| 2024-04-05 | Tommy Tuberville | Acquired @ 144.12 | |||
| 2024-03-25 | Philip Binns | Disposed 2827 @ 147.54 | View | ||
| 2024-03-08 | Michael R Mcmullen | Disposed 52297 @ 150 | View | ||
| 2024-03-07 | Rodney Gonsalves | Disposed 4828 @ 149 | View | ||
| 2024-03-05 | Heidi Fields | Disposed 1658 @ 144.34 | View | ||
| 2023-12-27 | Philip Binns | Disposed 2880 @ 139.78 | View | ||
| 2023-12-18 | Rodney Gonsalves | Disposed 1500 @ 137.69 | View | ||
| 2023-12-15 | Henrik Ancher-Jensen | Disposed 26331 @ 138.36 | View | ||
| 2023-12-13 | Michael R Mcmullen | Disposed 2751 @ 130 | View | ||
| 2023-12-07 | Michael R Mcmullen | Disposed 62467 @ 130 | View |
Monitoring Agilent Technologies' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Agilent Technologies' insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Agilent Technologies. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Agilent Technologies' stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Agilent |
Agilent Technologies' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Agilent Technologies' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Agilent will maintain a workforce of about 42000 employees by December 2024.Agilent Technologies' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Agilent Technologies, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Agilent Technologies by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2024-11-11 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-06-14 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-06-13 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-05-14 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-11-16 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-11-15 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-05-05 | Representative Peter Welch | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Agilent Technologies Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset of 0.0758 % which means that for every 100 dollars spent on assets, it generated a profit of $0.0758. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.2466 %, implying that it made 0.2466 on every $100 invested by shareholders. Agilent Technologies' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Agilent Technologies manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, Agilent Technologies' Return On Tangible Assets are projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.14, whereas Return On Assets are forecasted to decline to 0.05. At present, Agilent Technologies' Non Currrent Assets Other are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Other Current Assets is expected to grow to about 283.8 M, whereas Total Assets are forecasted to decline to about 9.3 B.The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 302.4 M, whereas Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is forecasted to decline to about 807.6 M.
Agilent Technologies Workforce Comparison
Agilent Technologies is rated fourth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Health Care industry is presently estimated at about 279,058. Agilent Technologies holds roughly 17,400 in number of employees claiming about 6% of equities under Health Care industry.
Agilent Technologies Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin of 0.22 %, which indicates that it operates at a low-profit margin and even a small decline in sales will erase profits resulting in a net loss, or a negative margin. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin of 0.25 %, which implies that for every $100 of sales, it generated an operating income of $0.25.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.4 | 0.46 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.21 | 0.198 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.24 | 0.2286 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.2336 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.052 | 0.1 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.1 | 0.19 |
|
|
Agilent Technologies Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Agilent Technologies insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Agilent Technologies' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Agilent Technologies insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-01 | 0.3333 | 6 | 18 | 23,690 | 20,561 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 6,213 | 18,963 |
| 2024-06-01 | 0.5556 | 5 | 9 | 24,792 | 23,721 |
| 2024-03-01 | 2.5 | 15 | 6 | 22,772 | 62,114 |
| 2023-12-01 | 0.7556 | 34 | 45 | 517,259 | 267,381 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 9,411 | 5,388 |
| 2023-03-01 | 7.5 | 15 | 2 | 72,412 | 52,785 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.4722 | 34 | 72 | 638,552 | 585,605 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 5,598 | 7,459 |
| 2022-03-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 18,594 | 1,746 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.6364 | 35 | 55 | 521,866 | 341,098 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 18,633 | 39,459 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.2222 | 4 | 18 | 33,874 | 152,621 |
| 2021-03-01 | 1.0 | 13 | 13 | 27,944 | 121,198 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.4595 | 34 | 74 | 569,155 | 528,327 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 86,054 | 173,716 |
| 2020-06-01 | 1.0556 | 19 | 18 | 48,907 | 106,387 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.125 | 1 | 8 | 9,033 | 30,870 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.2727 | 24 | 88 | 565,844 | 412,599 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.1111 | 1 | 9 | 24,635 | 60,006 |
| 2019-03-01 | 1.2105 | 23 | 19 | 72,923 | 126,285 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.5 | 17 | 34 | 460,090 | 101,205 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.1429 | 1 | 7 | 5,482 | 15,191 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 25,203 | 33,453 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.2105 | 23 | 19 | 154,862 | 237,979 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.5385 | 28 | 52 | 500,756 | 408,899 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.48 | 12 | 25 | 160,552 | 330,549 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.5 | 12 | 24 | 161,168 | 310,867 |
| 2017-03-01 | 1.2667 | 19 | 15 | 139,470 | 207,447 |
| 2016-12-01 | 1.0 | 19 | 19 | 267,558 | 54,529 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.4375 | 7 | 16 | 28,285 | 68,885 |
| 2016-06-01 | 0.5 | 11 | 22 | 195,438 | 424,720 |
| 2016-03-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 69,254 | 68,198 |
| 2015-12-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 185,526 | 81,562 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 5,842 | 1,045 |
| 2015-06-01 | 0.4444 | 4 | 9 | 68,808 | 133,746 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.1429 | 32 | 28 | 425,568 | 449,110 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.6486 | 24 | 37 | 923,173 | 266,791 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.7647 | 13 | 17 | 623,782 | 1,230,080 |
| 2014-06-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 113,507 | 227,883 |
| 2014-03-01 | 1.2857 | 18 | 14 | 344,070 | 635,049 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.7586 | 44 | 58 | 1,118,030 | 667,205 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 223,793 | 497,640 |
| 2013-06-01 | 1.0 | 8 | 8 | 55,007 | 116,180 |
| 2013-03-01 | 1.1538 | 15 | 13 | 140,486 | 193,127 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.7381 | 31 | 42 | 1,350,709 | 865,769 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 22,211 | 51,497 |
| 2012-06-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 6,974 | 10,917 |
| 2012-03-01 | 1.0 | 16 | 16 | 65,525 | 58,032 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.7838 | 29 | 37 | 1,046,511 | 253,539 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.5 | 7 | 14 | 50,444 | 110,354 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.6563 | 21 | 32 | 833,619 | 1,664,040 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.9091 | 20 | 22 | 119,233 | 176,228 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.925 | 37 | 40 | 1,084,966 | 439,314 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 40,363 | 2,221 |
| 2010-06-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 1,788 | 84.00 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.7143 | 30 | 42 | 1,124,700 | 2,149,655 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.8852 | 54 | 61 | 2,077,358 | 1,899,931 |
| 2009-03-01 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 | 174,733 | 556.00 |
| 2008-12-01 | 2.55 | 51 | 20 | 1,561,950 | 184,821 |
| 2008-09-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 3,950 | 8,041 |
| 2008-06-01 | 0.4667 | 28 | 60 | 337,024 | 450,062 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.4667 | 35 | 75 | 1,105,648 | 467,206 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.4655 | 27 | 58 | 513,906 | 369,711 |
| 2007-03-01 | 1.1538 | 15 | 13 | 283,063 | 653,675 |
| 2006-12-01 | 35.0 | 35 | 1 | 666,362 | 7.69 |
| 2006-09-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 22,789 | 81,473 |
| 2006-06-01 | 3.75 | 15 | 4 | 16,456 | 24,107 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.5806 | 18 | 31 | 216,027 | 558,120 |
| 2005-12-01 | 7.3333 | 22 | 3 | 701,603 | 16,880 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 88,137 | 164,046 |
| 2005-06-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 145,754 | 33,333 |
| 2005-03-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 44,930 | 115,000 |
| 2004-12-01 | 4.1429 | 29 | 7 | 699,060 | 58,246 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 16,773 | 11,758 |
| 2004-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 97,299 | 205,942 |
| 2003-12-01 | 3.4 | 17 | 5 | 459,366 | 191,239 |
| 2003-06-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 34,565 | 93,418 |
| 2000-03-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 2,423 | 25,538 |
Agilent Technologies Notable Stakeholders
An Agilent Technologies stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Agilent Technologies often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Agilent Technologies' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Agilent Technologies' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Michael McMullen | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
| Boon Koh | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Jacob Thaysen | Senior Vice President, Agilent, President - Life Sciences and Applied Markets Group | Profile | |
| Samraat Raha | Senior Vice President, Agilent, President - Diagnostics and Genomics Group | Profile | |
| Robert McMahon | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Rodney Gonsalves | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President, Corporate Controllership | Profile | |
| Henrik AncherJensen | Senior Vice President, Agilent and President - Order Fulfillment | Profile | |
| Angelica III | Senior President | Profile | |
| Jonah Kirkwood | Senior President | Profile | |
| Dominique Grau | Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Global Communications | Profile | |
| Michael Tang | Senior Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Robert CMA | Senior CFO | Profile | |
| Daniel Podolsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Hans Bishop | Independent Director | Profile | |
| George Scangos | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sue Rataj | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Paul Clark | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mala Anand | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Dow Wilson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Heidi Kunz | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Tadataka Yamada | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jenipher Dalton | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Diana Chiu | Interim VP | Profile | |
| Bret DiMarco | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Simon May | SVP Group | Profile | |
| Philip Binns | Senior Group | Profile | |
| Padraig McDonnell | Senior Vice President and Presidentident - Agilent CrossLab Group | Profile | |
| Darlene Solomon | CTO VP | Profile | |
| John Kohl | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Mikael Dolsten | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Allison Ballmer | Vice President - Strategy and Corporate Development | Profile | |
| Otis Brawley | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Susan Rataj | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Katharine Knobil | Chief Medical Officer. | Profile | |
| Yvonne Mackie | MD Europe | Profile |
About Agilent Technologies Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Agilent Technologies often depends on how effective the management is. Agilent Technologies management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Agilent management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Agilent management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.18 | 0.19 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.13 | 0.14 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.10 | 0.05 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.19 | 0.10 |
Please note, the presentation of Agilent Technologies' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Agilent Technologies' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Agilent Technologies' management manipulating its earnings.
Agilent Technologies Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Agilent Technologies use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Agilent Technologies within its industry.Agilent Technologies Manpower Efficiency
Return on Agilent Technologies Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 374.1K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 186M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 74.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 36.8M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 148.4K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 73.8M |
Complementary Tools for Agilent Stock analysis
When running Agilent Technologies' price analysis, check to measure Agilent Technologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Agilent Technologies is operating at the current time. Most of Agilent Technologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Agilent Technologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Agilent Technologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Agilent Technologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device |