Iron Force (Taiwan) Insiders
| 2228 Stock | TWD 97.00 0.80 0.82% |
Iron Force employs about 15 people. The company is managed by 3 executives with a total tenure of roughly 7 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 5.0 employees per reported executive. Recap of Iron Force's management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
| Zhigang Li Executive Deputy General Manager-Group |
| Meng You Insider F Incharge |
Iron |
Iron Force Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0417 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0417 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.099 %, meaning that it generated $0.099 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Iron Force's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Iron Force manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Iron Force Workforce Comparison
Iron Force Industrial is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Auto Parts industry is presently estimated at about 1,477. Iron Force claims roughly 15.0 in number of employees contributing just under 2% to stocks in Auto Parts industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.09 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.09 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.09. Iron Force Industrial Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Iron Force Industrial Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Iron Force price series and its benchmark/peer.
Iron Force Notable Stakeholders
An Iron Force stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Iron Force often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Iron Force's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Iron Force's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Zhigang Li | Deputy General Manager-Group | Profile | |
| Meng You | F Incharge | Profile | |
| Hank Huang | President | Profile |
About Iron Force Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Iron Force Industrial often depends on how effective the management is. Iron Force management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Iron management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Iron management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Iron Force Industrial Co., Ltd. manufactures and trades in auto parts, and display and houseware products in Taiwan and internationally. The company was founded in 1977 and is headquartered in New Taipei City, Taiwan. IRON FORCE operates under Auto Parts classification in Taiwan and is traded on Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Iron Force's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Iron Force Industrial. Check Iron Force's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Iron Force's management manipulating its earnings.
Iron Force Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Iron Force use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Iron Force within its industry.Iron Force Manpower Efficiency
Return on Iron Force Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 245.2M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 1.2B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 15.9M | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 79.5M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 138.1M | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 690.7M |
Additional Tools for Iron Stock Analysis
When running Iron Force's price analysis, check to measure Iron Force's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Iron Force is operating at the current time. Most of Iron Force's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Iron Force's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Iron Force's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Iron Force to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.