Nan Ya (Taiwan) Insiders
1303 Stock | TWD 32.95 1.60 4.63% |
Nan Ya employs about 57 people. The company is managed by 32 executives with a total tenure of roughly 305 years, averaging almost 9.0 years of service per executive, having 1.78 employees per reported executive. Recap of Nan Ya's management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
ChiaChau Wu Chairman Chairman of the Board |
Nan |
Nan Ya Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0432 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0432 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.1378 %, meaning that it generated $0.1378 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Nan Ya's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Nan Ya manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Nan Ya Workforce Comparison
Nan Ya Plastics is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Materials industry is presently estimated at about 57,383. Nan Ya adds roughly 57.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Materials industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.13 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.12 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.12. Nan Ya Plastics Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Nan Ya Plastics Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Nan Ya price series and its benchmark/peer.
Nan Ya Notable Stakeholders
A Nan Ya stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Nan Ya often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Nan Ya's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Nan Ya's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
ChiaChau Wu | Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
ChengChung Lee | Senior Deputy General Manager, Director | Profile | |
FongChin Lin | Senior Deputy General Manager, Director | Profile | |
ShenYi Lee | Director | Profile | |
MingJen Tzou | General Manager, Director | Profile | |
ChingCheng Chang | Director | Profile | |
YunPeng Chu | Independent Director | Profile | |
Yi Lin | Independent Director | Profile | |
SinYi Huang | Senior Deputy General Manager, Director | Profile | |
KueiYung Wang | Senior Deputy General Manager, Director | Profile | |
ZoChun Jen | Director | Profile | |
ChihKang Wang | Managing Director, Independent Director | Profile | |
Ruey Wang | Managing Director | Profile | |
Wilfred Wang | Managing Director | Profile | |
Wen Wong | Managing Director | Profile | |
MingJong Yeh | Head of Finance | Profile | |
WenChiao Wang | MD Director | Profile | |
PauChang Liu | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
LiTa Pai | Financial Officer | Profile | |
YuLung Huang | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
RueyYu Wang | MD Director | Profile | |
KuoWei Lin | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
Zhengzhong Li | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
YungFang Chang | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
YangDoun Chien | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
ShiouYeh Sheng | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
YuSheng Chen | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
TzongYang Su | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
WenYuan Wong | MD Director | Profile | |
WenCheng Yang | Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
ChungYueh Shih | Senior Deputy General Manager | Profile | |
ChihYun Su | Accounting Officer | Profile |
About Nan Ya Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Nan Ya Plastics often depends on how effective the management is. Nan Ya management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Nan management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Nan management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation manufactures and sells plastics products, plastic materials, petrochemicals, electronic materials, and polyester fiber products in Taiwan, China and Hong Kong, the United States, and internationally. The company was founded in 1958 and is headquartered in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. NAN YA operates under Specialty Chemicals classification in Taiwan and is traded on Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Nan Ya's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Nan Ya Plastics. Check Nan Ya's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Nan Ya's management manipulating its earnings.
Nan Ya Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Nan Ya use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Nan Ya within its industry.Nan Ya Manpower Efficiency
Return on Nan Ya Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 7.2B | |
Revenue Per Executive | 12.9B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 1.4B | |
Net Income Per Executive | 2.5B | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 2.3B | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 4.1B |
Additional Tools for Nan Stock Analysis
When running Nan Ya's price analysis, check to measure Nan Ya's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Nan Ya is operating at the current time. Most of Nan Ya's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Nan Ya's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Nan Ya's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Nan Ya to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.