Microsoft (UK) Insiders
| 0QYP Stock | 429.50 5.00 1.15% |
Microsoft employs about 228 K people. The company is managed by 14 executives with a total tenure of roughly 532000 years, averaging almost 38000.0 years of service per executive, having 16285.71 employees per reported executive. Breaking down Microsoft's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Bradford LCA Chairman President Chairman |
Microsoft |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1459 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1459 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.356 %, meaning that it generated $0.356 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is presently estimated at about 237,396. Microsoft totals roughly 228,000 in number of employees claiming about 96% of equities under Industrials industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.36 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.47 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.47. Microsoft Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Microsoft Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Microsoft price series and its benchmark/peer.
Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Bradford LCA | President Chairman | Profile | |
| Amy Hood | Executive CFO | Profile | |
| Carolina Happe | Executive COO | Profile | |
| James Scott | Executive CTO | Profile | |
| Hossein Nowbar | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Brett Iversen | Vice Relations | Profile | |
| Christopher Young | Strategy Development | Profile | |
| Takeshi Numoto | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Satya Nadella | Chairman CEO | Profile | |
| Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile | |
| Judson Althoff | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Alice Jolla | Corporate Officer | Profile | |
| Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
| Christopher Capossela | Ex Officer | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Microsoft is entity of United Kingdom. It is traded as Stock on LSE exchange.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Check Microsoft's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 1.1M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 18.2B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 317.4K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 5.2B |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.