Marsh McLennan Correlations
| MSN Stock | EUR 203.40 0.30 0.15% |
The current 90-days correlation between Marsh McLennan Companies and Aon PLC is 0.14 (i.e., Average diversification). The correlation of Marsh McLennan is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Marsh McLennan Correlation With Market
Very weak diversification
The correlation between Marsh McLennan Companies and DJI is 0.53 (i.e., Very weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marsh McLennan Companies and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Marsh |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Marsh McLennan could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Marsh McLennan when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Marsh McLennan - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Marsh McLennan Companies to buy it.
Moving together with Marsh Stock
| 0.84 | 4VK | Aon PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.93 | GAH | Arthur J Gallagher | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | WTY | Willis Towers Watson | PairCorr |
| 0.89 | BTW | Brown Brown | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | CWK0 | CRAWFORD A NV | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | AVLA | Air Lease | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | WDP | Walt Disney | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | WB1 | Westamerica Bancorporation | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | M4I | Mastercard | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | XPH | Amphenol | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | ZIM | Zimmer Biomet Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.69 | 5AP | Palo Alto Networks Split | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | A3B | ACCO Brands | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | 3EC | Eaton PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | FQI | Digital Realty Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | GTT | TEGNA Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | PCG6 | PG E P6 | PairCorr |
| 0.78 | QBE | QBE Insurance Group | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | UBK | UMWELTBANK | PairCorr |
Moving against Marsh Stock
| 0.71 | 18M | Sabre Insurance Group | PairCorr |
| 0.59 | 4Y7 | PLATO GOLD P | PairCorr |
| 0.45 | TEY | Teradyne | PairCorr |
| 0.42 | 03F | IDP EDUCATION LTD | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Marsh Stock performing well and Marsh McLennan Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Marsh McLennan's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSN | 0.88 | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.04 | 1.09 | 1.77 | 6.94 | |||
| 4VK | 0.92 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.92 | 2.19 | 8.35 | |||
| GAH | 1.27 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 1.12 | 3.11 | 7.97 | |||
| WTY | 1.03 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.99 | 2.74 | 8.36 | |||
| 1S6 | 1.30 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 1.63 | 2.48 | 10.52 | |||
| CWK0 | 1.61 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.56 | 1.84 | 4.45 | 9.98 | |||
| VVV3 | 1.43 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 2.08 | 3.52 | 10.12 | |||
| 18M | 1.17 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 7.71 |
Be your own money manager
Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Marsh McLennan without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.Did you try this?
Run FinTech Suite Now
FinTech SuiteUse AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities |
| All Next | Launch Module |
Marsh McLennan Corporate Management
Elected by the shareholders, the Marsh McLennan's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Marsh McLennan inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Marsh. The board's role is to monitor Marsh McLennan's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Marsh McLennan's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Marsh McLennan's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Martine Ferland | Vice Chair | Profile | |
| John Jones | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Paul Beswick | VP Officer | Profile | |
| Stacy Mills | Controller VP | Profile | |
| Carmen Fernandez | VP Officer | Profile | |
| Daniel Glaser | CEO Pres | Profile | |
| Sarah Dewitt | VP Relations | Profile |