Goldman Sachs Correlations
GCLN Etf | USD 35.60 0.57 1.63% |
The current 90-days correlation between Goldman Sachs Bloomberg and Global X Wind is 0.57 (i.e., Very weak diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Goldman Sachs moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Goldman Sachs Bloomberg moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
Goldman Sachs Correlation With Market
Average diversification
The correlation between Goldman Sachs Bloomberg and DJI is 0.14 (i.e., Average diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Bloomberg and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Goldman |
Moving together with Goldman Etf
0.66 | IXC | iShares Global Energy | PairCorr |
0.62 | BND | Vanguard Total Bond Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
0.67 | CAT | Caterpillar Fiscal Year End 3rd of February 2025 | PairCorr |
0.64 | HPQ | HP Inc | PairCorr |
Moving against Goldman Etf
0.45 | VUG | Vanguard Growth Index | PairCorr |
0.51 | BA | Boeing Fiscal Year End 29th of January 2025 | PairCorr |
0.39 | VOX | Vanguard Communication | PairCorr |
0.34 | WMT | Walmart | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Goldman Sachs Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Goldman Etf performing well and Goldman Sachs ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Goldman Sachs' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META | 1.26 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 1.44 | 2.62 | 7.43 | |||
MSFT | 0.87 | 0.01 | 0.00 | (0.09) | 1.61 | 1.78 | 8.14 | |||
UBER | 1.72 | (0.19) | 0.00 | (0.96) | 0.00 | 2.67 | 20.41 | |||
F | 1.39 | (0.10) | 0.00 | (0.34) | 0.00 | 2.38 | 11.21 | |||
T | 0.96 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 1.15 | 1.93 | 7.95 | |||
A | 1.12 | (0.12) | 0.00 | (0.34) | 0.00 | 2.43 | 8.06 | |||
CRM | 1.47 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 6.67 | 1.34 | 3.18 | 14.80 | |||
JPM | 1.06 | 0.26 | 0.19 | (17.88) | 1.04 | 1.99 | 15.87 | |||
MRK | 0.96 | (0.21) | 0.00 | (0.89) | 0.00 | 1.72 | 5.17 | |||
XOM | 0.77 | (0.15) | 0.00 | (0.76) | 0.00 | 1.71 | 6.06 |