Restaurant Competitors

Stocks . Germany . 
Stock . Restaurant Brands International
0R6 Stock  EUR 61.86  1.16  1.84%   
Restaurant Brands competes with ALLFUNDS GROUP, Tokentus Investment, HK Electric, G5 Entertainment, and Scottish Mortgage; as well as few others. The company classifies itself under Consumer Cyclical sector and is part of Restaurants industry. Analyzing Restaurant Brands competition allows you to expand the diversification possibilities of your existing portfolios and to get a better perspective on locking in new positions. Investors sometimes prefer comparable analysis of Restaurant Brands to its intrinsic valuation because they are able to contrast its competitors on a relative basis. Check out Restaurant Brands Correlation with its peers.
You can use the Comparative Equity Analysis module to analyze the advantages of investing in your portfolio's related equities across multiple sectors and thematic ideas. Please use the input box below to enter symbols for particular investments you would like to analyze. With the equity comparison module, you can estimate the relative effect of Restaurant Brands competition on your existing holdings.
  
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
60.2161.8663.51
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
60.1761.8263.47
Details

Restaurant Brands Competition Correlation Matrix

Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Restaurant Brands and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Restaurant and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Restaurant Brands does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
Click cells to compare fundamentals   Check Volatility   Backtest Portfolio
High positive correlations   
U09
+ 1.0
CUG
YT2A
+ 0.73
U3I
1IZ1
+ 0.7
U3I
1IZ1
+ 0.62
14D
U3I
+ 0.55
14D
U3I
+ 0.45
HKT
  
High negative correlations   
HKT
- 0.55
6UY
1IZ1
- 0.46
6UY
U3I
- 0.31
6UY
HKT
- 0.11
14D
U09
- 0.0
YT2A
U09
- 0.0
1IZ1

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Restaurant Stock performing well and Restaurant Brands Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Restaurant Brands' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.
All Fundamental Data

Restaurant Brands Competitive Analysis

The better you understand Restaurant Brands competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Restaurant Brands' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Restaurant Brands' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
0R6 6UY 14D CUG HKT U3I 1IZ1 YT2A U09
 1.84 
 61.86 
Restaurant
 5.00 
 5.13 
ALLFUNDS
 2.46 
 1.25 
Tokentus
 0.00 
 0.01 
Chuangs
 1.54 
 0.64 
HKT
 2.91 
 11.30 
U3I
 1.15 
 11.41 
Scottish
 0.20 
 4.97 
ATRESMEDIA
 0.00 
 0.04 
MEDCAW
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Very steady
Somewhat reliable
Dangerous
Very steady
Risky
Not too volatile
Not too volatile
Somewhat reliable
Not too volatile
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Very Weak
Very Weak
Insignificant
Very Weak
Weak
OK
Very Weak
Good
Very Weak
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Low
Quite High
Quite High
Quite High
Low
Low
Quite High
Low
Low
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Fairly Valued
Fairly Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Fairly Valued
Under Valued
Fairly Valued
Over Valued
Buy or Sell Advice
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Hold
Hold
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
Sell
Strong Hold
Strong Hold
Hold
Strong Sell
Current Ratio
1.1
1.13
4.19
2.04
N/A
1.63
0.75
N/A
N/A
Net Asset
22.75 B
N/A
N/A
6.68 B
114.83 B
625.79 M
N/A
1.41 B
N/A
Profit Margin
0.16
0.0262
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0478
N/A
N/A
N/A
EBITDA
2.07 B
313.45 M
(1.38 M)
393.93 M
N/A
343.48 M
N/A
183.37 M
N/A
Operating Margin
0.31
0.0743
N/A
-0.68
N/A
N/A
1.01
N/A
N/A
Current Valuation
32.21 B
N/A
N/A
(22.94 M)
11.99 B
149.86 M
25.26 B
843.76 M
N/A
Price To Book
8.78
N/A
N/A
0.12
0.98
3.56
N/A
1.13
N/A
Five Year Return
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Beta
0.99
N/A
2.83
0.42
N/A
0.91
0.7
N/A
N/A
Number Of Employees
6.4 K
765
4
109
N/A
6
8
29
N/A
Shares Outstanding
307.97 M
629.43 M
157.85 M
2.35 B
N/A
8.17 M
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cash Flow From Operations
1.49 B
835.67 M
(3.53 M)
(50.69 M)
N/A
360.63 M
(85.91 M)
193.77 M
N/A
Annual Yield
0.0338
N/A
N/A
0.19
0.37
0.0369
N/A
0.2
N/A
Total Debt
12.84 B
N/A
N/A
764.54 M
45.39 B
N/A
1.24 B
260.36 M
N/A
Return On Equity
0.37
0.0309
-0.17
-0.16
N/A
0.14
-0.49
N/A
N/A
Z Score
1.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
N/A
1.8
N/A
Return On Asset
0.055
0.024
-0.11
-0.0061
N/A
0.0564
-0.27
N/A
N/A
Book Value Per Share
8.14
3.73
1.55
1.65
N/A
4.04
8.42
N/A
N/A
Total Asset
22.75 B
N/A
N/A
6.68 B
114.83 B
625.79 M
N/A
1.41 B
N/A
Debt To Equity
355.4
N/A
N/A
48.2
N/A
0.011
0.072
N/A
N/A
Target Price
73.05
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
86.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Last Dividend Paid
2.16
0.05
N/A
0.02
N/A
N/A
0.037
0.2
N/A
Shares Owned By Institutions
86.56
79.25
3.5
1.79
N/A
19.87
9.21
N/A
N/A
Market Capitalization
28 B
4.76 B
143.1 M
70.5 M
7.68 B
144.77 M
N/A
807.37 M
N/A
Price To Earning
28.13
N/A
N/A
3.47
N/A
27.91
2.41
N/A
N/A
Price To Earnings To Growth
2.02
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.41
N/A
N/A
N/A
Price To Sales
4.5
N/A
N/A
0.81
4.36
1.3
N/A
0.85
N/A
Net Income
1.01 B
(43 K)
(4.61 M)
227.76 M
N/A
198.21 M
(2.54 B)
118.54 M
N/A
Earnings Per Share
3.1
0.17
-0.16
-0.04
N/A
0.78
-2.08
N/A
N/A
Shares Owned By Insiders
1.48
0.007
N/A
61.15
N/A
33.11
3.55
N/A
N/A
Revenue
6.5 B
2.83 B
N/A
204.54 M
N/A
1.32 B
(7.48 B)
877.87 M
N/A
Cash And Equivalents
902 M
N/A
13.09 M
154.17 M
N/A
N/A
212.13 M
N/A
N/A
Cash Per Share
3.55
N/A
0.08
0.07
N/A
N/A
0.15
N/A
N/A
Gross Profit
2.6 B
505.69 M
(20.1 K)
134.22 M
N/A
936.42 M
(2.4 B)
N/A
N/A
Day Typical Price
61.86
5.13
1.26
0.01
0.64
11.3
11.41
4.97
0.0405
Accumulation Distribution
N/A
N/A
0.031
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Market Facilitation Index
N/A
N/A
0.04
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Daily Balance Of Power
(9,223,372,036,855)
(9,223,372,036,855)
0.75
0.0
(9,223,372,036,855)
9.2 T
9.2 T
(9,223,372,036,855)
0.0
Period Momentum Indicator
(1.16)
(0.27)
0.03
N/A
(0.01)
0.32
0.13
(0.01)
N/A
Rate Of Daily Change
0.98
0.95
1.02
1.0
0.98
1.03
1.01
1.0
1.0
Day Median Price
61.86
5.13
1.27
0.01
0.64
11.3
11.41
4.97
0.0405
Price Action Indicator
(0.58)
(0.14)
(0.01)
N/A
(0.01)
0.16
0.065
(0.01)
N/A
Coefficient Of Variation
(1,696)
(1,506)
3141.2
N/A
3073.76
617.7
(12,635)
712.78
N/A
Mean Deviation
1.26
1.3
2.57
N/A
0.4667
1.9
1.33
1.15
N/A
Jensen Alpha
(0.04)
(0.06)
0.0713
N/A
0.0144
0.4286
0.0364
0.1949
N/A
Total Risk Alpha
0.1413
0.1419
0.7114
N/A
0.1454
0.8165
0.2348
0.4423
N/A
Sortino Ratio
N/A
N/A
0.054
N/A
0.0881
0.192
N/A
0.2434
N/A
Downside Variance
N/A
N/A
20.02
N/A
2.67
7.98
N/A
1.88
N/A
Standard Deviation
1.62
1.77
3.92
N/A
0.8404
2.63
1.69
1.55
N/A
Kurtosis
(0.01)
0.7817
2.79
N/A
0.6051
1.98
0.5289
0.9935
N/A
Potential Upside
2.58
3.04
6.8
N/A
1.56
4.6
2.53
3.02
N/A
Treynor Ratio
(0.22)
(0.24)
(0.34)
N/A
(0.74)
4.09
(0.05)
(2.20)
N/A
Maximum Drawdown
7.38
9.28
18.18
N/A
3.15
16.62
9.05
8.65
N/A
Variance
2.62
3.12
15.34
N/A
0.7062
6.92
2.87
2.39
N/A
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
(0.21)
(0.23)
(0.33)
N/A
(0.73)
4.1
(0.04)
(2.19)
N/A
Risk Adjusted Performance
(0.04)
(0.05)
0.0344
N/A
0.0272
0.1415
(0)
0.1213
N/A
Skewness
0.352
0.1826
0.175
N/A
0.0483
(0.12)
(0.43)
0.474
N/A
Semi Deviation
N/A
N/A
3.18
N/A
0.6007
2.31
N/A
1.19
N/A
Information Ratio
0.0131
(0.0004)
0.0616
N/A
0.1714
0.2063
0.061
0.2158
N/A
Value At Risk
(2.55)
(3.30)
(4.83)
N/A
(1.54)
(3.43)
(2.86)
(2.14)
N/A
Expected Short fall
N/A
N/A
(3.98)
N/A
(1.57)
(2.02)
N/A
(1.34)
N/A
Downside Deviation
N/A
N/A
4.47
N/A
1.63
2.82
N/A
1.37
N/A
Semi Variance
N/A
N/A
10.11
N/A
0.3609
5.32
N/A
1.42
N/A

Restaurant Brands Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Restaurant Brands Competition

Restaurant Brands' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Restaurant Brands in relation to its competition. Restaurant Brands' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:
  • Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Restaurant Brands in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
  • Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
  • Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' competitive landscape.
  • Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Restaurant Brands, and developing a strategy to address them.
  • Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Competitive analysis is an essential tool for businesses to stay ahead of the competition and can be used to inform decision-making and strategy development. By understanding the competitive landscape and staying informed about the activities of competitors, a company can make more informed decisions and improve its overall performance.

Complement your Restaurant Brands position

In addition to having Restaurant Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Technology Thematic Idea Now

Technology
Technology Theme
Companies that are involved in development or distribution of technologically based goods and services such as software, IT or electronics. The Technology theme has 30 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Technology Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Restaurant Stock

When determining whether Restaurant Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze Restaurant Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Restaurant Stock, refer to the following important reports:
How To Invest In Restaurant
Details
Is Restaurant Stock a good investment?
Details
What is Restaurant Brands' Net Worth?
Details
Largest Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Companies
View
Largest Consumer Services Companies
View
Check out Restaurant Brands Correlation with its peers.
You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.
Altman
Z Score
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
Details
Financial
Analysis
Details
Buy or Sell
Advice
Details
Technical
Analysis
Details
Please note, there is a significant difference between Restaurant Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Restaurant Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Restaurant Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions
 
Feedback Blog
Made with optimal in San Francisco
2024 Macroaxis LLC
COMMON DESTINATIONS
MAIN CATEGORIES
COMPANY