Scientific Games Shares Outstanding vs. Price To Book

TJW Stock  EUR 89.00  3.50  3.78%   
Based on Scientific Games' profitability indicators, Scientific Games may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at the moment. It has a very high risk of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Scientific Games' ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Scientific Games profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Scientific Games to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Scientific Games utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Scientific Games's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Scientific Games over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out World Market Map.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Scientific Games' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Scientific Games is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Scientific Games' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Scientific Games Price To Book vs. Shares Outstanding Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Scientific Games's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Scientific Games value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Scientific Games is currently regarded as top stock in shares outstanding category among its peers. It is rated below average in price to book category among its peers . The ratio of Shares Outstanding to Price To Book for Scientific Games is about  16,657,823 . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Scientific Games' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Scientific Price To Book vs. Shares Outstanding

Outstanding Shares are shares of common stock of a public company that were purchased by investors after they were authorized and issued by the company to the public. Outstanding Shares are typically reported on fully diluted basis, including exotic instruments such as options, or convertibles bonds.

Scientific Games

Shares Outstanding

 = 

Public Shares

-

Repurchased

 = 
93.67 M
Outstanding shares that are stated on company Balance Sheet are used when calculating many important valuation and performance indicators including Return on Equity, Market Cap, EPS and many others.
Price to Book (P/B) ratio is used to relate a company book value to its current market price. A high P/B ratio indicates that investors expect executives to generate more returns on their investments from a given set of assets. Book value is the accounting value of assets minus liabilities.

Scientific Games

P/B

 = 

MV Per Share

BV Per Share

 = 
5.62 X
Price to Book ratio is mostly used in financial services industries where assets and liabilities are typically represented by dollars. Although low Price to Book ratio generally implies that the firm is undervalued, it is often a good indicator that the company may be in financial or managerial distress and should be investigated more carefully.

Scientific Price To Book Comparison

Scientific Games is currently under evaluation in price to book category among its peers.

Scientific Games Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Scientific Games, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Scientific Games will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Scientific Games' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Scientific Games, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Scientific Games Corporation develops technology-based products and services, and related content for the gaming, lottery, and digital gaming industries worldwide. The company was founded in 1984 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. SCIENT GAMES operates under Gambling classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 9700 people.

Scientific Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Scientific Games. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Scientific Games position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Scientific Games' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Scientific Games in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Scientific Games Pair Trading

Scientific Games Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Scientific Games could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Scientific Games when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Scientific Games - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Scientific Games to buy it.
The correlation of Scientific Games is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Scientific Games moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Scientific Games moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Scientific Games can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Scientific Games position

In addition to having Scientific Games in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run SPAC Thematic Idea Now

SPAC
SPAC Theme
Entities that are involved in raising capital, merging with and acquiring companies, and investing in private equity through leveraged buyouts. The SPAC theme has 25 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize SPAC Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Other Information on Investing in Scientific Stock

To fully project Scientific Games' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Scientific Games at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Scientific Games' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Scientific Games investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Scientific Games investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Scientific Games's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Scientific Games's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.