Financial Services Net Asset vs. Last Dividend Paid

RYFAX Fund  USD 83.38  1.26  1.53%   
Based on Financial Services' profitability indicators, Financial Services Fund may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at this time. It has a very high probability of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Financial Services' ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Financial Services profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Financial Services to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Financial Services Fund utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Financial Services's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Financial Services Fund over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out Your Equity Center.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Financial Services' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Financial Services is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Financial Services' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Financial Services Last Dividend Paid vs. Net Asset Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Financial Services's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Financial Services value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Financial Services Fund is rated top fund in net asset among similar funds. It also is rated top fund in last dividend paid among similar funds . The ratio of Net Asset to Last Dividend Paid for Financial Services Fund is about  20,843,750 . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Financial Services' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Financial Last Dividend Paid vs. Net Asset

Net Asset is the current market value of a fund less its liabilities. In a nutshell, if the fund is liquidated or all of the assets is sold out, the net asset will be the amount that the shareholders would demand back from the fund.

Financial Services

Net Asset

 = 

Current Market Value

-

Current Liabilities

 = 
6.67 M
Net Asset is the value used in calculating NAV of a fund. NAV (or Net Asset Value) is computed once a day based on the formula that uses closing prices of all positions in the fund's portfolio.
Last Dividend Paid refers to dividend per share(DPS) paid to the shareholder the last time dividends were issued by a company. In its conventional sense, dividends refer to the distribution of some of a company's net earnings or capital gains decided by the board of directors.

Financial Services

Last Dividend

 = 

Last Profit Distribution Amount

Total Shares

 = 
0.32
Many stable companies today pay out dividends to their shareholders in the form of the income distribution, but high-growth firms rarely offer dividends because all of their earnings are reinvested back to the business.

Financial Last Dividend Paid Comparison

Financial Services is currently under evaluation in last dividend paid among similar funds.

Financial Services Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Financial Services, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Financial Services will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Financial Services' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Financial Services, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
The fund invests substantially all of its net assets in equity securities of Financial Services Companies that are traded in the United States and in derivatives, which primarily consist of futures contracts and options on securities, futures contracts, and stock indices. It may invest to a significant extent in the securities of Financial Services Companies that have small to mid-sized capitalizations. The fund also may purchase American Depositary Receipts to gain exposure to foreign Financial Services Companies and U.S. government securities.

Financial Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Financial Services. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Financial Services position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Financial Services' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Financial Services in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Financial Services position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial Services will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Financial Services Pair Trading

Financial Services Fund Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Financial Services could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Financial Services when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Financial Services - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Financial Services Fund to buy it.
The correlation of Financial Services is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Financial Services moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Financial Services moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Financial Services can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Financial Services position

In addition to having Financial Services in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Furniture Thematic Idea Now

Furniture
Furniture Theme
Companies producing and selling home and office furniture. The Furniture theme has 42 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Furniture Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Other Information on Investing in Financial Mutual Fund

To fully project Financial Services' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Financial Services at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Financial Services' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Financial Services investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Financial Services investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Financial Services's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Financial Services's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity