Gaming Corps Shares Owned By Insiders vs. EBITDA

GCOR Stock  SEK 0.57  0.01  1.72%   
Based on Gaming Corps' profitability indicators, Gaming Corps AB may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at the moment. It has a very high risk of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Gaming Corps' ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Gaming Corps profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Gaming Corps to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Gaming Corps AB utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Gaming Corps's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Gaming Corps AB over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Gaming Corps' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Gaming Corps is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Gaming Corps' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Gaming Corps AB EBITDA vs. Shares Owned By Insiders Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Gaming Corps's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Gaming Corps value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Gaming Corps AB is one of the top stocks in shares owned by insiders category among its peers. It also is one of the top stocks in ebitda category among its peers . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Gaming Corps' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Gaming EBITDA vs. Shares Owned By Insiders

Shares Owned by Insiders show the percentage of outstanding shares owned by insiders (such as principal officers or members of the board of directors) or private individuals and entities with over 5% of the total shares outstanding. Company executives or private individuals with access to insider information share information about a firm's operations that is not available to the general public.

Gaming Corps

Insiders Shares

 = 

Executives Shares

+

Employees

 = 
29.99 %
Although the research on effects of insider trading on prices and volatility is still relatively inconclusive, and investors are advised to pay close attention to the distribution of equities among company's stakeholders to avoid many problems associated with the disclosure of price-sensitive information.
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.

Gaming Corps

EBITDA

 = 

Revenue

-

Basic Expenses

 = 
(20.4 M)
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.

Gaming EBITDA Comparison

Gaming Corps is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.

Gaming Corps Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Gaming Corps, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Gaming Corps will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Gaming Corps' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Gaming Corps, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Gaming Corps AB develops videogames and interactive entertainment in Sweden. The company was founded in 2013 and is based in Stockholm, Sweden. Gaming Corps is traded on Stockholm Stock Exchange in Sweden.

Gaming Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Gaming Corps. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Gaming Corps position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Gaming Corps' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Gaming Corps in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Gaming Corps position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming Corps will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Gaming Corps Pair Trading

Gaming Corps AB Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Gaming Corps could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Gaming Corps when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Gaming Corps - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Gaming Corps AB to buy it.
The correlation of Gaming Corps is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Gaming Corps moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Gaming Corps AB moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Gaming Corps can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Gaming Corps position

In addition to having Gaming Corps in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Israel Wall Street Thematic Idea Now

Israel Wall Street
Israel Wall Street Theme
Cross-sector collection of best publicly traded Israel entities that are expected to continue growing. The Israel Wall Street theme has 71 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Israel Wall Street Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Additional Tools for Gaming Stock Analysis

When running Gaming Corps' price analysis, check to measure Gaming Corps' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Gaming Corps is operating at the current time. Most of Gaming Corps' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Gaming Corps' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Gaming Corps' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Gaming Corps to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.