Full House EBITDA vs. Operating Margin

FLL Stock  USD 4.49  0.04  0.88%   
Based on the measurements of profitability obtained from Full House's financial statements, Full House Resorts may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at the present time. It has a very high chance of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Full House's ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
 
EBITDA  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
29.9 M
Current Value
31.4 M
Quarterly Volatility
11.1 M
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
At this time, Full House's EV To Sales is quite stable compared to the past year. Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio is expected to rise to 0.18 this year, although the value of Price To Sales Ratio will most likely fall to 0.73. At this time, Full House's Interest Income is quite stable compared to the past year. Change To Netincome is expected to rise to about 7.9 M this year, although the value of Operating Income is projected to rise to (1.1 M).
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.620.545
Fairly Up
Slightly volatile
For Full House profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Full House to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Full House Resorts utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Full House's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Full House Resorts over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  

Full House's Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment

Check out Investing Opportunities.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. If investors know Full will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Full House listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.056
Earnings Share
(1.18)
Revenue Per Share
8.042
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.058
Return On Assets
(0)
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Full House's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Full House Resorts Operating Margin vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Full House's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Full House value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Full House Resorts is rated below average in ebitda category among its peers. It is rated below average in operating margin category among its peers . The ratio of EBITDA to Operating Margin for Full House Resorts is about  5,074,067,797 . At this time, Full House's EBITDA is quite stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Full House by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.

Full Operating Margin vs. EBITDA

EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.

Full House

EBITDA

 = 

Revenue

-

Basic Expenses

 = 
29.94 M
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Operating Margin shows how much operating income a company makes on each dollar of sales. It is one of the profitability indicators which helps analysts to understand whether the firm is successful or not making money from everyday operations.

Full House

Operating Margin

 = 

Operating Income

Revenue

X

100

 = 
0.01 %
A good Operating Margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs or payout its debt, which implies that the higher the margin, the better. This ratio is most effective in evaluating the earning potential of a company over time when comparing it against a firm's competitors.

Full Operating Margin Comparison

Full House is currently under evaluation in operating margin category among its peers.

Full House Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Full House, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Full House will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Full House's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Full House, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Operating Income-1.2 M-1.1 M
Income Before Tax-23.8 M-22.6 M
Total Other Income Expense Net-22.6 M-21.5 M
Net Loss-24.9 M-23.7 M
Income Tax Expense1.1 M1.1 M
Net Loss-13.3 M-12.7 M
Net Loss-19.4 M-18.4 M
Non Operating Income Net Other-4.1 M-3.9 M
Interest Income4.3 M5.5 M
Net Interest Income-20.1 M-21.1 M
Change To Netincome7.5 M7.9 M
Net Loss(0.72)(0.69)
Income Quality(0.90)(0.85)
Net Income Per E B T 1.05  0.66 

Full Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Full House. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Full House position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Full House's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Full House in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Full House position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Full House will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Full House Pair Trading

Full House Resorts Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Full House could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Full House when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Full House - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Full House Resorts to buy it.
The correlation of Full House is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Full House moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Full House Resorts moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Full House can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Full House position

In addition to having Full House in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Cannabis Thematic Idea Now

Cannabis
Cannabis Theme
Equities that are involved in production and delivery of legal cannabis. This theme is designed for investors that are willing to accept higher levels of market risk inherited by cannabis production and distribution globally. The Cannabis theme has 30 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Cannabis Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch
When determining whether Full House Resorts is a strong investment it is important to analyze Full House's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Full House's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Full Stock, refer to the following important reports:
To fully project Full House's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Full House Resorts at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Full House's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Full House investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Full House investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Full House's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Full House's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.