Federal Agricultural EBITDA vs. Return On Equity
| AGM-A Stock | USD 165.26 3.26 2.01% |
EBITDA | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 225.5 M | Current Value 242.4 M | Quarterly Volatility 153.6 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 1.09 | 1.15 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.68 | 0.7144 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.46 | 0.7248 |
|
|
For Federal Agricultural profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Federal Agricultural to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Federal Agricultural Mortgage utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Federal Agricultural's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Federal Agricultural Mortgage over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Federal |
Federal Agricultural Return On Equity vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Federal Agricultural's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Federal Agricultural value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Federal Agricultural Mortgage is rated below average in ebitda category among its peers. It is rated below average in return on equity category among its peers . The ratio of EBITDA to Return On Equity for Federal Agricultural Mortgage is about 1,618,729,361 . At present, Federal Agricultural's EBITDA is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Federal Agricultural's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Federal Return On Equity vs. EBITDA
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Federal Agricultural |
| = | 225.49 M |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Return on Equity or ROE tells company stockholders how effectually their money is being utilized or reinvested. It is a useful ratio when analyzing company profitability or the management effectiveness given the capital invested by the shareholders. ROE shows how efficiently a company utilizes investments to generate income.
Federal Agricultural |
| = | 0.14 |
For most industries, Return on Equity between 10% and 30% are considered desirable to provide dividends to owners and have funds for the future growth of the company. Investors should be very careful using ROE as the only efficiency indicator because ROE can be high if a company is heavily leveraged.
Federal Return On Equity Comparison
Federal Agricultural is currently under evaluation in return on equity category among its peers.
Federal Agricultural Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Federal Agricultural, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Federal Agricultural will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Federal Agricultural's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Federal Agricultural, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -40.1 M | -38.1 M | |
| Operating Income | 249.5 M | 208.7 M | |
| Net Income | 200 M | 210 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 53.1 M | 55.8 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 253.1 M | 265.8 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 3.6 M | 3.8 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 200 M | 120 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 173.6 M | 87.3 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 4.8 M | 4.5 M | |
| Net Interest Income | 327.5 M | 227.6 M | |
| Interest Income | 1.4 B | 1.5 B | |
| Change To Netincome | 20.5 M | 19.5 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 18.47 | 19.39 | |
| Income Quality | 1.88 | 1.68 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.79 | 0.78 |
Federal Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Federal Agricultural. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Federal Agricultural position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Federal Agricultural's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Federal Agricultural in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Federal Agricultural position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Federal Agricultural will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Federal Agricultural Pair Trading
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Federal Agricultural could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Federal Agricultural when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Federal Agricultural - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Federal Agricultural Mortgage to buy it.
The correlation of Federal Agricultural is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Federal Agricultural moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Federal Agricultural moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Federal Agricultural can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Federal Agricultural position
In addition to having Federal Agricultural in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Macroaxis Index Thematic Idea Now
Macroaxis Index
An experimental equal-weighted index theme of selected equities generated based on Macroaxis rating and scoring system. The Macroaxis Index theme has 52 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Macroaxis Index Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Trending Equities. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.
To fully project Federal Agricultural's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Federal Agricultural at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Federal Agricultural's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.