Mammoth Energy Services Stock Piotroski F Score
| TUSK Stock | USD 3.58 0.08 2.19% |
Mammoth | Piotroski F Score |
At this time, it appears that Mammoth Energy's Piotroski F Score is Poor. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
4.0
Piotroski F Score - Poor
| Current Return On Assets | Negative |
| Change in Return on Assets | Decreased |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Positive |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Improving |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Increase |
| Current Ratio Change | Decrease |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Higher Leverage |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Decrease |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change |
Mammoth Energy Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Mammoth Energy is to make sure Mammoth is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Mammoth Energy's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Mammoth Energy's financial numbers are properly reported.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.69 | 0.4431 |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 155.5 M | 182.6 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Liabilities Total | 80 M | 55.8 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 804.5 M | 698.5 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 366 M | 496.9 M |
|
|
Mammoth Energy Services F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Mammoth Energy's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Mammoth Energy in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Mammoth Energy Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.Book Value Per Share |
|
Mammoth Energy ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Mammoth Energy's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Mammoth Energy's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
About Mammoth Energy Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Mammoth Energy Services's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Mammoth Energy using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Mammoth Energy Services based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Mammoth Energy Altman Z Score, Mammoth Energy Correlation, Mammoth Energy Valuation, as well as analyze Mammoth Energy Alpha and Beta and Mammoth Energy Hype Analysis. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Is Oil & Gas Equipment & Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Mammoth Energy. If investors know Mammoth will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Mammoth Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (4.12) | Revenue Per Share 3.905 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.38) | Return On Assets (0.15) | Return On Equity (0.54) |
The market value of Mammoth Energy Services is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Mammoth that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Mammoth Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Mammoth Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Mammoth Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Mammoth Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Mammoth Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Mammoth Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Mammoth Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.