North American Construction Stock EBITDA
| NOA Stock | CAD 28.58 0.58 2.07% |
North American Construction fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to North American's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of North Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure North American's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to North American stock.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| EBITDA | 228.7 M | 240.1 M |
North | EBITDA |
North American Construction Company EBITDA Analysis
North American's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current North American EBITDA | 228.69 M |
Most of North American's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, North American Construction is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
North EBITDA Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for North American is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of North Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as EBITDA. Since North American's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of North American's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of North American's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
North Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, North American Construction reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 228.69 M. This is 96.18% lower than that of the Energy Equipment & Services sector and 52.64% lower than that of the Energy industry. The ebitda for all Canada stocks is 94.13% higher than that of the company.
North EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses North American's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of North American could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing North American by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.North American is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
North American Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of North American from analyzing North American's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess North American's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of North American's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Market Cap | 517.0M | 383.4M | 651.4M | 734.6M | 661.1M | 694.2M | |
| Enterprise Value | 943.6M | 785.6M | 1.0B | 1.4B | 1.2B | 1.3B |
North Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0824 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.05 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.19 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.52 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 26.83 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 9.18 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 79.20 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.06 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 7.66 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 1.96 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.65 X | ||||
| Revenue | 957.22 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 220.82 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 228.69 M | ||||
| Net Income | 63.14 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 40.33 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 1.38 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 717.05 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 2.01 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.22 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 14.61 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 270.39 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 43.59 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 1.90 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 3.71 X | ||||
| Target Price | 35.88 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 194 | ||||
| Beta | 1.6 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 766.72 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.55 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 123.03 M | ||||
| Working Capital | (28.82 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 79.09 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 62.34 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.02 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 1.42 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 1.55 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.4 |
About North American Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze North American Construction's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of North American using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of North American Construction based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with North American
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if North American position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in North American will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to North American could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace North American when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back North American - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling North American Construction to buy it.
The correlation of North American is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as North American moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if North American Const moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for North American can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in North American Construction. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.