Mfs Multimarket Income Stock Beneish M Score

MMT Stock  USD 4.71  0.03  0.64%   
This module uses fundamental data of MFS Multimarket to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. MFS Multimarket M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out MFS Multimarket Piotroski F Score and MFS Multimarket Altman Z Score analysis.
  
Interest Debt Per Share is likely to gain to 1.67 in 2024, whereas Short Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 65.5 M in 2024. At this time, MFS Multimarket's Free Cash Flow Per Share is comparatively stable compared to the past year. ROIC is likely to gain to 0.07 in 2024, whereas Inventory Turnover is likely to drop (2.44) in 2024.
At this time, it appears that MFS Multimarket Income is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if MFS Multimarket's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by MFS Multimarket executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of MFS Multimarket's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.9
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

0.78

Focus
Asset Quality

1.02

Focus
Expense Coverage

0.92

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

0.8

Focus
Accruals Factor

0.92

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

1.0

Focus
Net Sales Growth

1.04

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

0.78

Focus

MFS Multimarket Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if MFS Multimarket's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables8.7 M10.6 M
Significantly Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets418.1 M331.2 M
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets8.3 M11.4 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Selling General Administrative406.9 K428.3 K
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities96.9 M92.3 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Net Debt79.2 M85.5 M
Significantly Down
Slightly volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities37.5 M45.6 M
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Long Term Investments406.7 M320.5 M
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.750.94
Significantly Down
Very volatile

MFS Multimarket Income Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between MFS Multimarket's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards MFS Multimarket in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find MFS Multimarket's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About MFS Multimarket Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Operating Income

15.75 Million

At this time, MFS Multimarket's Operating Income is comparatively stable compared to the past year.

MFS Multimarket Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as MFS Multimarket. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables10.8M7.1M7.9M11.8M10.6M8.7M
Total Revenue17.1M26.7M(57.1M)18.6M16.7M17.3M
Total Assets484.2M474.9M387.4M368.1M331.2M418.1M
Total Current Assets11.2M7.1M8.4M12.7M11.4M8.3M
Net Debt99.7M100.0M99.5M95.0M85.5M79.2M
Operating Income16.4M26.1M(55.9M)18.0M16.2M15.7M

About MFS Multimarket Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze MFS Multimarket Income's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of MFS Multimarket using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of MFS Multimarket Income based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Explore Investing Ideas  

Additional Tools for MFS Stock Analysis

When running MFS Multimarket's price analysis, check to measure MFS Multimarket's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy MFS Multimarket is operating at the current time. Most of MFS Multimarket's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of MFS Multimarket's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move MFS Multimarket's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of MFS Multimarket to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.