| HWO Stock | | | CAD 1.06 0.01 0.93% |
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out
Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in High Arctic Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as
signals in board of governors.
At this time, High Arctic's
Capital Lease Obligations is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 14th of March 2025,
Net Invested Capital is likely to grow to about 141.3
M, while
Capital Surpluse is likely to drop about 12.3
M. At this time, High Arctic's
Depreciation And Amortization is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 14th of March 2025,
Selling General Administrative is likely to grow to about 14.4
M, while
Interest Expense is likely to drop about 314.6
K.
High Arctic Energy Company Z Score Analysis
High Arctic's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
| First Factor | = | 1.2 * ( | Working Capital | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Second Factor | = | 1.4 * ( | Retained Earnings | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Thrid Factor | = | 3.3 * ( | EBITAD | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Fouth Factor | = | 0.6 * ( | Market Value of Equity | / | Total Liabilities ) |
|
| Fifth Factor | = | 0.99 * ( | Revenue | / | Total Assets ) |
|
High Z Score Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for High Arctic is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of High Stock properly, considering its historical
fundamentals such as Z Score. Since High Arctic's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of High Arctic's historical
financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of High Arctic's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
According to the company's disclosures, High Arctic Energy has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Energy Equipment & Services sector and 100.0% lower than that of the
Energy industry. The z score for all Canada stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
High Arctic Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of High Arctic from analyzing High Arctic's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess High Arctic's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of High Arctic's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (projected) |
| Market Cap | | 461.8M | 229.6M | 290.7M | 208.5M | 239.8M | 227.8M |
| Enterprise Value | | 463.2M | 216.2M | 295.2M | 164.5M | 189.2M | 179.7M |
High Fundamentals
About High Arctic Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze High Arctic Energy's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of High Arctic using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of High Arctic Energy based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Other Information on Investing in High Stock
High Arctic financial ratios help investors to determine whether High Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or
enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in High with respect to the benefits of owning High Arctic security.