Asana Inc Stock Piotroski F Score
| ASAN Stock | USD 15.31 0.16 1.06% |
Asana | Piotroski F Score |
At this time, it appears that Asana's Piotroski F Score is Poor. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
4.0
Piotroski F Score - Poor
| Current Return On Assets | Negative |
| Change in Return on Assets | Decreased |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Negative |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Improving |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Decrease |
| Current Ratio Change | Increase |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Lower Leverage |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Decrease |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change |
Asana Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Asana is to make sure Asana is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Asana's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Asana's financial numbers are properly reported.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.42 | 0.6783 |
|
| |||||
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.7 | 0.9011 |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 231.3 M | 367.2 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Liabilities Total | 277.5 M | 268.4 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 713.3 M | 962 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 487.9 M | 659.7 M |
|
|
Asana Inc F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Asana's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Asana in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Asana Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.Book Value Per Share |
|
Asana ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Asana's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Asana's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
About Asana Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Asana Inc's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Asana using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Asana Inc based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Asana
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Asana position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Asana will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Asana Stock
| 0.88 | DJCO | Daily Journal Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.78 | AI | C3 Ai Inc Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | AZ | A2Z Smart Technologies | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | BL | Blackline | PairCorr |
Moving against Asana Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Asana could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Asana when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Asana - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Asana Inc to buy it.
The correlation of Asana is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Asana moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Asana Inc moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Asana can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Asana Altman Z Score, Asana Correlation, Asana Valuation, as well as analyze Asana Alpha and Beta and Asana Hype Analysis. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Is Systems Software space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Asana. If investors know Asana will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Asana listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (1.15) | Revenue Per Share 3.053 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.103 | Return On Assets (0.18) | Return On Equity (0.83) |
The market value of Asana Inc is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Asana that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Asana's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Asana's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Asana's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Asana's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Asana's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Asana is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Asana's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.