Correlation Between Stellar and Compound Governance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stellar and Compound Governance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stellar and Compound Governance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stellar and Compound Governance Token, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stellar and Compound Governance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stellar with a short position of Compound Governance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stellar and Compound Governance.

Diversification Opportunities for Stellar and Compound Governance

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stellar and Compound is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stellar and Compound Governance Token in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Compound Governance Token and Stellar is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stellar are associated (or correlated) with Compound Governance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Compound Governance Token has no effect on the direction of Stellar i.e., Stellar and Compound Governance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stellar and Compound Governance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Stellar is expected to generate 2.35 times more return on investment than Compound Governance. However, Stellar is 2.35 times more volatile than Compound Governance Token. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Compound Governance Token is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9.15  in Stellar on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  45.85  from holding Stellar or generate 501.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Stellar  vs.  Compound Governance Token

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Stellar 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stellar are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady primary indicators, Stellar exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Compound Governance Token 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Compound Governance Token are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Compound Governance exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Stellar and Compound Governance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Stellar and Compound Governance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stellar and Compound Governance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stellar position performs unexpectedly, Compound Governance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Compound Governance will offset losses from the drop in Compound Governance's long position.
The idea behind Stellar and Compound Governance Token pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like