Correlation Between WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in WR Berkley with a short position of Aspen Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance

0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between WRB-PF and Aspen is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings and WR Berkley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on WR Berkley are associated (or correlated) with Aspen Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspen Insurance Holdings has no effect on the direction of WR Berkley i.e., WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon WR Berkley is expected to under-perform the Aspen Insurance. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, WR Berkley is 1.32 times less risky than Aspen Insurance. The preferred stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Aspen Insurance Holdings is currently generating about -0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,117  in Aspen Insurance Holdings on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (24.00) from holding Aspen Insurance Holdings or give up 1.13% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

WR Berkley  vs.  Aspen Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
WR Berkley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days WR Berkley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental drivers, WR Berkley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aspen Insurance Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if WR Berkley position performs unexpectedly, Aspen Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspen Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Aspen Insurance's long position.
The idea behind WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios