Correlation Between Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble DRC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Verizon Communications with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

0.62

Correlation Coefficient

Verizon Communications  Procter Gamble

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Verizon and Procter is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble DRC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble DRC and Verizon Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble DRC has no effect on the direction of Verizon Communications i.e., Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days horizon Verizon Communications is expected to generate 1.25 times less return on investment than Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Verizon Communications is 1.43 times more volatile than Procter Gamble DRC. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble DRC is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  336,710  in Procter Gamble DRC on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11,290  from holding Procter Gamble DRC or generate 3.35% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Verizon Communications  vs.  Procter Gamble DRC

Verizon Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Verizon Communications is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble DRC

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble DRC are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Verizon Communications position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble DRC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.