Correlation Between Visa and CINCINNATI
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Visa Class A and CINCINNATI FINL P, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Visa and CINCINNATI and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Visa with a short position of CINCINNATI. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Visa and CINCINNATI.
Diversification Opportunities for Visa and CINCINNATI
-0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Visa and CINCINNATI is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Visa Class A and CINCINNATI FINL P in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CINCINNATI FINL P and Visa is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Visa Class A are associated (or correlated) with CINCINNATI. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CINCINNATI FINL P has no effect on the direction of Visa i.e., Visa and CINCINNATI go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Visa and CINCINNATI
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Visa Class A is expected to generate 3.36 times more return on investment than CINCINNATI. However, Visa is 3.36 times more volatile than CINCINNATI FINL P. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CINCINNATI FINL P is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest 27,801 in Visa Class A on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 3,707 from holding Visa Class A or generate 13.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 78.13% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Visa Class A vs. CINCINNATI FINL P
Performance |
Timeline |
Visa Class A |
CINCINNATI FINL P |
Visa and CINCINNATI Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Visa and CINCINNATI
The main advantage of trading using opposite Visa and CINCINNATI positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Visa position performs unexpectedly, CINCINNATI can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CINCINNATI will offset losses from the drop in CINCINNATI's long position.Visa vs. American Express | Visa vs. PayPal Holdings | Visa vs. Capital One Financial | Visa vs. Upstart Holdings |
CINCINNATI vs. Freedom Internet Group | CINCINNATI vs. Solstad Offshore ASA | CINCINNATI vs. Weibo Corp | CINCINNATI vs. KNOT Offshore Partners |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |