Correlation Between ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between ProShares UltraPro Short and MicroSectors FANG Index, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in ProShares UltraPro with a short position of MicroSectors FANG. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG.

Diversification Opportunities for ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG

-0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between ProShares and MicroSectors is -0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ProShares UltraPro Short and MicroSectors FANG Index in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MicroSectors FANG Index and ProShares UltraPro is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on ProShares UltraPro Short are associated (or correlated) with MicroSectors FANG. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MicroSectors FANG Index has no effect on the direction of ProShares UltraPro i.e., ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG

Given the investment horizon of 90 days ProShares UltraPro Short is expected to under-perform the MicroSectors FANG. But the etf apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, ProShares UltraPro Short is 1.3 times less risky than MicroSectors FANG. The etf trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The MicroSectors FANG Index is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  38,380  in MicroSectors FANG Index on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  25,938  from holding MicroSectors FANG Index or generate 67.58% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

ProShares UltraPro Short  vs.  MicroSectors FANG Index

 Performance 
       Timeline  
ProShares UltraPro Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ProShares UltraPro Short has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with weak performance in the last few months, the Etf's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the ETF retail investors.
MicroSectors FANG Index 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MicroSectors FANG Index are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, MicroSectors FANG unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG

The main advantage of trading using opposite ProShares UltraPro and MicroSectors FANG positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if ProShares UltraPro position performs unexpectedly, MicroSectors FANG can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MicroSectors FANG will offset losses from the drop in MicroSectors FANG's long position.
The idea behind ProShares UltraPro Short and MicroSectors FANG Index pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments