Correlation Between Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Seligman Global and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Seligman with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and GOLDMAN is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Seligman Global and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Columbia Seligman is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Seligman Global are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Columbia Seligman i.e., Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Seligman Global is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Columbia Seligman is 1.45 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Small. It trades about -0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  5,498  in Goldman Sachs Small on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (446.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Small or give up 8.11% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Seligman Global  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Seligman Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Columbia Seligman Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Goldman Sachs Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Seligman and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Seligman position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Columbia Seligman Global and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk