Correlation Between Starbucks and La Rosa
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Starbucks and La Rosa at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Starbucks and La Rosa into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Starbucks and La Rosa Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Starbucks and La Rosa and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Starbucks with a short position of La Rosa. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Starbucks and La Rosa.
Diversification Opportunities for Starbucks and La Rosa
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Starbucks and LRHC is -0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Starbucks and La Rosa Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on La Rosa Holdings and Starbucks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Starbucks are associated (or correlated) with La Rosa. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of La Rosa Holdings has no effect on the direction of Starbucks i.e., Starbucks and La Rosa go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Starbucks and La Rosa
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Starbucks is expected to generate 1.54 times less return on investment than La Rosa. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Starbucks is 13.49 times less risky than La Rosa. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. La Rosa Holdings is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 99.00 in La Rosa Holdings on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (33.00) from holding La Rosa Holdings or give up 33.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Starbucks vs. La Rosa Holdings
Performance |
Timeline |
Starbucks |
La Rosa Holdings |
Starbucks and La Rosa Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Starbucks and La Rosa
The main advantage of trading using opposite Starbucks and La Rosa positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Starbucks position performs unexpectedly, La Rosa can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in La Rosa will offset losses from the drop in La Rosa's long position.Starbucks vs. RLJ Lodging Trust | Starbucks vs. Aquagold International | Starbucks vs. Stepstone Group | Starbucks vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets |