Correlation Between Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Balanced with a short position of Fidelity Advisor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor

0.92

Correlation Coefficient

Aggressive Balanced  Fidelity Advisor

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Fidelity is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Advisor Growth and Aggressive Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Advisor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Advisor Growth has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Balanced i.e., Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Balanced Allocation is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Advisor. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Aggressive Balanced Allocation is 1.25 times less risky than Fidelity Advisor. The mutual fund trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Fidelity Advisor Growth is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  17,340  in Fidelity Advisor Growth on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  770.00  from holding Fidelity Advisor Growth or generate 4.44% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Aggressive Balanced Allocation  vs.  Fidelity Advisor Growth

Aggressive Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Advisor Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Growth are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Fidelity Advisor showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Balanced and Fidelity Advisor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Advisor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Advisor will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Advisor's long position.

The idea behind Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.