Correlation Between RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between RCI Hospitality Holdings and Penta Ocean Construction Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in RCI Hospitality with a short position of Penta-Ocean Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction

-0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between RCI and Penta-Ocean is -0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding RCI Hospitality Holdings and Penta Ocean Construction Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penta-Ocean Construction and RCI Hospitality is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on RCI Hospitality Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Penta-Ocean Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penta-Ocean Construction has no effect on the direction of RCI Hospitality i.e., RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon RCI Hospitality Holdings is expected to generate 2.46 times more return on investment than Penta-Ocean Construction. However, RCI Hospitality is 2.46 times more volatile than Penta Ocean Construction Co. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Penta Ocean Construction Co is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,813  in RCI Hospitality Holdings on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  637.00  from holding RCI Hospitality Holdings or generate 13.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

RCI Hospitality Holdings  vs.  Penta Ocean Construction Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
RCI Hospitality Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in RCI Hospitality Holdings are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, RCI Hospitality unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Penta-Ocean Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penta Ocean Construction Co are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Penta-Ocean Construction is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite RCI Hospitality and Penta-Ocean Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if RCI Hospitality position performs unexpectedly, Penta-Ocean Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penta-Ocean Construction will offset losses from the drop in Penta-Ocean Construction's long position.
The idea behind RCI Hospitality Holdings and Penta Ocean Construction Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity