Correlation Between Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Principal Lifetime Hybrid and Goldman Sachs Clean, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Principal Lifetime with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs

0.2
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Principal and Goldman is 0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Principal Lifetime Hybrid and Goldman Sachs Clean in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Clean and Principal Lifetime is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Principal Lifetime Hybrid are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Clean has no effect on the direction of Principal Lifetime i.e., Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Principal Lifetime Hybrid is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Principal Lifetime Hybrid is 1.04 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs Clean is currently generating about -0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  866.00  in Goldman Sachs Clean on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (37.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Clean or give up 4.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Principal Lifetime Hybrid  vs.  Goldman Sachs Clean

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Principal Lifetime Hybrid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Principal Lifetime Hybrid has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Principal Lifetime is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Clean 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Principal Lifetime and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Principal Lifetime position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Principal Lifetime Hybrid and Goldman Sachs Clean pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios