Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Kimberly Clark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark

0.13

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Kimberly Clark

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Kimberly is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kimberly Clark and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Kimberly Clark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kimberly Clark has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon The Procter Gamble is expected to under-perform the Kimberly Clark. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, The Procter Gamble is 1.04 times less risky than Kimberly Clark. The stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Kimberly Clark is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  81,272  in Kimberly Clark on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,351) from holding Kimberly Clark or give up 2.89% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Kimberly Clark

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days The Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Kimberly Clark

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Kimberly Clark has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental drivers, Kimberly Clark is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Kimberly Clark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kimberly Clark will offset losses from the drop in Kimberly Clark's long position.

The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Kimberly Clark pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.