Correlation Between PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Floating Rate and Minerals Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Floating with a short position of Minerals Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies.
Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies
-0.11 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Minerals is -0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Floating Rate and Minerals Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Minerals Technologies and PennantPark Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Minerals Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Minerals Technologies has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Floating i.e., PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies
Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Floating is expected to generate 17.76 times less return on investment than Minerals Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, PennantPark Floating Rate is 2.21 times less risky than Minerals Technologies. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Minerals Technologies is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 7,409 in Minerals Technologies on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 704.00 from holding Minerals Technologies or generate 9.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PennantPark Floating Rate vs. Minerals Technologies
Performance |
Timeline |
PennantPark Floating Rate |
Minerals Technologies |
PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Floating and Minerals Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Floating position performs unexpectedly, Minerals Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Minerals Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Minerals Technologies' long position.PennantPark Floating vs. Ares Capital | PennantPark Floating vs. Hercules Capital | PennantPark Floating vs. Main Street Capital |
Minerals Technologies vs. Quaker Chemical | Minerals Technologies vs. Innospec | Minerals Technologies vs. H B Fuller | Minerals Technologies vs. Cabot |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal |