Correlation Between PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Floating Rate and LithiumBank Resources Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Floating with a short position of LithiumBank Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources.
Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources
0.17 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and LithiumBank is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Floating Rate and LithiumBank Resources Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LithiumBank Resources and PennantPark Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with LithiumBank Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LithiumBank Resources has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Floating i.e., PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources
Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Floating Rate is expected to generate 0.19 times more return on investment than LithiumBank Resources. However, PennantPark Floating Rate is 5.2 times less risky than LithiumBank Resources. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. LithiumBank Resources Corp is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,103 in PennantPark Floating Rate on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 13.00 from holding PennantPark Floating Rate or generate 1.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PennantPark Floating Rate vs. LithiumBank Resources Corp
Performance |
Timeline |
PennantPark Floating Rate |
LithiumBank Resources |
PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources
The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Floating and LithiumBank Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Floating position performs unexpectedly, LithiumBank Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LithiumBank Resources will offset losses from the drop in LithiumBank Resources' long position.PennantPark Floating vs. Visa Class A | PennantPark Floating vs. Diamond Hill Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Distoken Acquisition | PennantPark Floating vs. Associated Capital Group |
LithiumBank Resources vs. Qubec Nickel Corp | LithiumBank Resources vs. IGO Limited | LithiumBank Resources vs. Focus Graphite | LithiumBank Resources vs. Mineral Res |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges |