Correlation Between Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Federated Pennsylvania Municipal and Sierra E Retirement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federated Pennsylvania with a short position of Sierra Core. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core.

Diversification Opportunities for Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core

0.18
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Federated and Sierra is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Federated Pennsylvania Municip and Sierra E Retirement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra E Retirement and Federated Pennsylvania is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Federated Pennsylvania Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Core. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra E Retirement has no effect on the direction of Federated Pennsylvania i.e., Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core

Assuming the 90 days horizon Federated Pennsylvania Municipal is expected to under-perform the Sierra Core. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Federated Pennsylvania Municipal is 2.3 times less risky than Sierra Core. The mutual fund trades about -0.48 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sierra E Retirement is currently generating about -0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,236  in Sierra E Retirement on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (47.00) from holding Sierra E Retirement or give up 2.1% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Federated Pennsylvania Municip  vs.  Sierra E Retirement

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Federated Pennsylvania 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Federated Pennsylvania Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Federated Pennsylvania is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Sierra E Retirement 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Sierra E Retirement has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Sierra Core is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core

The main advantage of trading using opposite Federated Pennsylvania and Sierra Core positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federated Pennsylvania position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Core can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Core will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Core's long position.
The idea behind Federated Pennsylvania Municipal and Sierra E Retirement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.