Correlation Between Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and Quaker Chemical, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of Quaker Chemical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical.

Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical

0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cogent and Quaker is 0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and Quaker Chemical in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Quaker Chemical and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Quaker Chemical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Quaker Chemical has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.79 times more return on investment than Quaker Chemical. However, Cogent Communications Holdings is 1.26 times less risky than Quaker Chemical. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Quaker Chemical is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,172  in Cogent Communications Holdings on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,078  from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 17.47% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cogent Communications Holdings  vs.  Quaker Chemical

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Quaker Chemical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Quaker Chemical has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Quaker Chemical is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and Quaker Chemical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, Quaker Chemical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quaker Chemical will offset losses from the drop in Quaker Chemical's long position.
The idea behind Cogent Communications Holdings and Quaker Chemical pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data