Correlation Between National HealthCare and Universal Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both National HealthCare and Universal Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining National HealthCare and Universal Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between National HealthCare and Universal Health Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on National HealthCare and Universal Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in National HealthCare with a short position of Universal Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of National HealthCare and Universal Health.

Diversification Opportunities for National HealthCare and Universal Health

0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between National and Universal is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding National HealthCare and Universal Health Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Health Services and National HealthCare is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on National HealthCare are associated (or correlated) with Universal Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Health Services has no effect on the direction of National HealthCare i.e., National HealthCare and Universal Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between National HealthCare and Universal Health

Considering the 90-day investment horizon National HealthCare is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than Universal Health. However, National HealthCare is 1.04 times less risky than Universal Health. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Health Services is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  13,026  in National HealthCare on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (579.00) from holding National HealthCare or give up 4.44% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

National HealthCare  vs.  Universal Health Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
National HealthCare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days National HealthCare has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical indicators, National HealthCare is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Universal Health Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Universal Health Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

National HealthCare and Universal Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with National HealthCare and Universal Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite National HealthCare and Universal Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if National HealthCare position performs unexpectedly, Universal Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Health will offset losses from the drop in Universal Health's long position.
The idea behind National HealthCare and Universal Health Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios