Correlation Between Madison Square and Reading International

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Madison Square and Reading International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Madison Square and Reading International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Madison Square Garden and Reading International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Madison Square and Reading International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Madison Square with a short position of Reading International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Madison Square and Reading International.

Diversification Opportunities for Madison Square and Reading International

-0.79

Correlation Coefficient

Madison Square  Reading International

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Madison and Reading is -0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Madison Square Garden and Reading International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reading International and Madison Square is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Madison Square Garden are associated (or correlated) with Reading International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reading International has no effect on the direction of Madison Square i.e., Madison Square and Reading International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Madison Square and Reading International

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Madison Square Garden is expected to generate 0.22 times more return on investment than Reading International. However, Madison Square Garden is 4.56 times less risky than Reading International. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Reading International is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  20,542  in Madison Square Garden on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,453  from holding Madison Square Garden or generate 11.94% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Madison Square Garden  vs.  Reading International

Madison Square Garden

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Madison Square Garden are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting technical and fundamental indicators, Madison Square may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Reading International

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Reading International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain strong and the recent confusion on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-lasting gains for the firm traders.

Pair Trading with Madison Square and Reading International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Madison Square and Reading International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Madison Square position performs unexpectedly, Reading International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reading International will offset losses from the drop in Reading International's long position.

The idea behind Madison Square Garden and Reading International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.