Correlation Between Microsoft and Restaurant Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Restaurant Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Restaurant Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Restaurant Brands International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Restaurant Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Restaurant Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Restaurant Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Restaurant Brands

-0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Restaurant is -0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Restaurant Brands Internationa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Restaurant Brands and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Restaurant Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Restaurant Brands has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Restaurant Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Restaurant Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 8.95 times more return on investment than Restaurant Brands. However, Microsoft is 8.95 times more volatile than Restaurant Brands International. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Restaurant Brands International is currently generating about 0.41 per unit of risk. If you would invest  42,973  in Microsoft on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,974  from holding Microsoft or generate 4.59% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy9.38%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Restaurant Brands Internationa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Strong
Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Microsoft and Restaurant Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Restaurant Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Restaurant Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Restaurant Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will offset losses from the drop in Restaurant Brands' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Restaurant Brands International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine