Correlation Between MLN and Request Network

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MLN and Request Network at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MLN and Request Network into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MLN and Request Network, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MLN and Request Network and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MLN with a short position of Request Network. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MLN and Request Network.

Diversification Opportunities for MLN and Request Network

0.49
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between MLN and Request is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MLN and Request Network in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Request Network and MLN is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MLN are associated (or correlated) with Request Network. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Request Network has no effect on the direction of MLN i.e., MLN and Request Network go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MLN and Request Network

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MLN is expected to under-perform the Request Network. But the crypto coin apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, MLN is 1.2 times less risky than Request Network. The crypto coin trades about -0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Request Network is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13.00  in Request Network on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.00) from holding Request Network or give up 7.69% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MLN  vs.  Request Network

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MLN 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days MLN has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Crypto's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for MLN shareholders.
Request Network 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Request Network has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Request Network is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

MLN and Request Network Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MLN and Request Network

The main advantage of trading using opposite MLN and Request Network positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MLN position performs unexpectedly, Request Network can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Request Network will offset losses from the drop in Request Network's long position.
The idea behind MLN and Request Network pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk