Correlation Between Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Patterson UTI Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Patterson-UTI Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy

0.41

Correlation Coefficient

Ming Le  Patterson-UTI Energy

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Patterson-UTI is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Patterson UTI Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Patterson UTI Energy and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Patterson-UTI Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Patterson UTI Energy has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to under-perform the Patterson-UTI Energy. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ming Le Sports is 1.02 times less risky than Patterson-UTI Energy. The stock trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Patterson UTI Energy is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  733.00  in Patterson UTI Energy on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  52.00  from holding Patterson UTI Energy or generate 7.09% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Patterson UTI Energy

Ming Le Sports

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Ming Le Sports has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.

Patterson UTI Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Patterson UTI Energy are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Patterson-UTI Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Patterson-UTI Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Patterson-UTI Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Patterson-UTI Energy will offset losses from the drop in Patterson-UTI Energy's long position.

The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Patterson UTI Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.