Correlation Between Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Global Real and Goldman Sachs Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Global with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs

1.0
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Goldman is 1.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Global Real and Goldman Sachs Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Global and Mfs Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Global Real are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Global has no effect on the direction of Mfs Global i.e., Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Global Real is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Mfs Global Real is 1.02 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs Global is currently generating about -0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,025  in Goldman Sachs Global on October 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (77.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Global or give up 7.51% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Global Real  vs.  Goldman Sachs Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Global Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Global Real has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Goldman Sachs Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Global and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Global position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Mfs Global Real and Goldman Sachs Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios