Correlation Between LM Funding and Cosmos Group

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both LM Funding and Cosmos Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining LM Funding and Cosmos Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between LM Funding America and Cosmos Group Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on LM Funding and Cosmos Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in LM Funding with a short position of Cosmos Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of LM Funding and Cosmos Group.

Diversification Opportunities for LM Funding and Cosmos Group

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between LMFA and Cosmos is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding LM Funding America and Cosmos Group Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cosmos Group Holdings and LM Funding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on LM Funding America are associated (or correlated) with Cosmos Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cosmos Group Holdings has no effect on the direction of LM Funding i.e., LM Funding and Cosmos Group go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between LM Funding and Cosmos Group

Given the investment horizon of 90 days LM Funding is expected to generate 127.55 times less return on investment than Cosmos Group. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, LM Funding America is 40.91 times less risky than Cosmos Group. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cosmos Group Holdings is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.01  in Cosmos Group Holdings on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.01) from holding Cosmos Group Holdings or give up 100.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

LM Funding America  vs.  Cosmos Group Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
LM Funding America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in LM Funding America are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat fragile technical and fundamental indicators, LM Funding sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Cosmos Group Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cosmos Group Holdings are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly abnormal basic indicators, Cosmos Group reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

LM Funding and Cosmos Group Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with LM Funding and Cosmos Group

The main advantage of trading using opposite LM Funding and Cosmos Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if LM Funding position performs unexpectedly, Cosmos Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cosmos Group will offset losses from the drop in Cosmos Group's long position.
The idea behind LM Funding America and Cosmos Group Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges