Correlation Between Las Vegas and Penn National

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Las Vegas and Penn National at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Las Vegas and Penn National into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Las Vegas and Penn National and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Las Vegas with a short position of Penn National. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Las Vegas and Penn National.

Diversification Opportunities for Las Vegas and Penn National

0.42
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Las and Penn is 0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penn National Gaming and Las Vegas is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Las Vegas Sands are associated (or correlated) with Penn National. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penn National Gaming has no effect on the direction of Las Vegas i.e., Las Vegas and Penn National go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Las Vegas and Penn National

Assuming the 90 days horizon Las Vegas Sands is expected to generate 0.81 times more return on investment than Penn National. However, Las Vegas Sands is 1.24 times less risky than Penn National. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Penn National Gaming is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,727  in Las Vegas Sands on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,259  from holding Las Vegas Sands or generate 33.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Las Vegas Sands  vs.  Penn National Gaming

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Las Vegas Sands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Las Vegas Sands are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Las Vegas reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Over the last 90 days Penn National Gaming has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Penn National is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Las Vegas and Penn National Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Las Vegas and Penn National

The main advantage of trading using opposite Las Vegas and Penn National positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Las Vegas position performs unexpectedly, Penn National can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penn National will offset losses from the drop in Penn National's long position.
The idea behind Las Vegas Sands and Penn National Gaming pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators