Correlation Between Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Global Technology Portfolio and Multimanager Lifestyle Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Global Technology with a short position of Multimanager Lifestyle. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle.

Diversification Opportunities for Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Global and Multimanager is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Global Technology Portfolio and Multimanager Lifestyle Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Multimanager Lifestyle and Global Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Global Technology Portfolio are associated (or correlated) with Multimanager Lifestyle. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Multimanager Lifestyle has no effect on the direction of Global Technology i.e., Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle

Assuming the 90 days horizon Global Technology Portfolio is expected to generate 2.14 times more return on investment than Multimanager Lifestyle. However, Global Technology is 2.14 times more volatile than Multimanager Lifestyle Growth. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Multimanager Lifestyle Growth is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,979  in Global Technology Portfolio on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  203.00  from holding Global Technology Portfolio or generate 10.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Global Technology Portfolio  vs.  Multimanager Lifestyle Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Global Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Technology Portfolio are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Global Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Multimanager Lifestyle 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Multimanager Lifestyle Growth are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Multimanager Lifestyle is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle

The main advantage of trading using opposite Global Technology and Multimanager Lifestyle positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Global Technology position performs unexpectedly, Multimanager Lifestyle can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Multimanager Lifestyle will offset losses from the drop in Multimanager Lifestyle's long position.
The idea behind Global Technology Portfolio and Multimanager Lifestyle Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity